Economic Research and Perspectives

Economic Research and Perspectives

Comparative PEST Analysis of International Practices in Implementing Land Value Capture (LVC) Mechanisms

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
Mahsa Fatahian 1
Reza Nasr Esfahani 2
Homayoon Nooraie 3
1 PhD in Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2 Associate Professor,Faculty Member, Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship,Isfahan University of Art, Isfahan, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
10.48311/ecor.2025.115459.0
Abstract
Abstract
Land Value Capture (LVC) mechanisms have gained global attention as innovative strategies for financing urban infrastructure and promoting spatial justice. This study utilizes a library-based research approach to compile reports documenting the application of LVC tools over the past decade across various regions. Eight successful international cases were analyzed: valorization and plusvalías in Colombia, surplus construction bonds in Brazil, zoning in the United States, transfer of development rights in India, developer obligations in Germany, joint development in Washington, D.C., the rail-plus-property model in Hong Kong, and land readjustment in Japan. Using the PEST analytical framework, the study identifies key success factors and challenges related to these instruments, drawing lessons applicable to Iran. The findings show that LVC can generate sustainable financial flows, reduce reliance on public budgets, and promote social equity through the redistribution of public investment benefits. However, challenges such as political shifts, real estate downturns, social resistance, and legal complexities affect outcomes. For effective adoption in Iran—facing urbanization, oil dependency, and sanctions—the study recommends strengthening political and legal support, diversifying financial resources, prioritizing social justice, and investing in technical infrastructure.
Purpose/Aims:
Infrastructure investment needs are projected to reach $57 trillion by 2030, exceeding local governments' financial capacity and highlighting the need for alternative revenue sources. Following the Habitat III Conference, LVC emerged as a solution to urban financing challenges. LVC tools, based on capturing increases in land value due to public investments and regulatory changes, can be redistributed for the public good.
This study aims to examine the success factors and challenges of LVC by analyzing eight global case studies: Valorización and Plusvalías in Colombia, Surplus Construction Bonds in Brazil, Zoning in the United States, Transfer of Development Rights in India, Developer Obligations in Germany, Joint Development in Washington, D.C., the Rail and Property model in Hong Kong, and Land Readjustment in Japan. The findings provide lessons for Iran's LVC implementation, offering insights into policymaking tailored to local conditions.
Methodology & Framework:
This study employs a library-based research approach, collecting data from official reports, case studies, and academic publications. The PEST framework (political, economic, social, and technical-legal factors) was used for analysis. A comparative examination of the eight international cases identified commonalities and divergences, based on geographical diversity, effectiveness, and relevance to Iran.
Findings:
The comparative analysis reveals the diversity of institutional frameworks, policy environments, and socio-cultural factors influencing LVC's success. These cases demonstrate how countries facing rapid urbanization, economic fluctuations, and inequality have developed strategies for financing urban development and promoting equity.
Politically, the findings stress the importance of strong legal foundations and multilevel coordination. In Colombia, well-defined frameworks and municipal autonomy allowed efficient valorization implementation. Similarly, Brazil’s City Statute and municipal charters strengthened São Paulo’s LVC practices, promoting public-private partnerships and transparency.
Economically, LVC tools have generated substantial financial returns, providing stable funding and reducing public budget reliance. Bogotá raised $683 million through valorization programs, São Paulo generated 3.3 billion reais with CEPAC bonds, and Hong Kong’s Rail and Property model produced an estimated $140 billion in net returns. These results suggest that well-structured LVC tools can ensure long-term financial sustainability without imposing excessive fiscal burdens.
Socially, LVC has advanced social justice by redistributing development benefits and improving public service access. Affordable housing policies in the U.S. and Germany, along with transit-oriented development (TOD) in Hong Kong and India, have fostered inclusive growth. Transparency and public participation have been crucial in building trust and reducing resistance.
Technically, effective regulatory and administrative systems are vital. The U.S. uses Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations and zoning adjustments to capture land value. Germany’s development yield indices and two-stage implementation provide clarity for developers, while Japan’s cadastral mapping and open public systems aid land readjustment programs. These examples show the need for strong legal and technical frameworks to ensure LVC's fair and consistent application.
Discussion:
Key lessons from these global cases emphasize strengthening political and legal support, diversifying financial resources, prioritizing public participation, and investing in technical infrastructure. In Iran, urban development faces rapid urbanization, a lack of affordable housing, informal settlements, aging infrastructure, and fiscal constraints from sanctions and oil dependency. LVC tools can provide innovative solutions for sustainable financing.
To implement LVC in Iran, it is essential to reinforce legal frameworks, empower local authorities, and improve coordination across government levels. Independent oversight mechanisms will enhance transparency. Attracting private investment, diversifying financial instruments, and ensuring equitable risk-sharing between the public and private sectors will reduce reliance on public funds. Socially, prioritizing LVC revenues for affordable housing, preventing displacement, and fostering community participation will help mitigate conflicts.
Investing in digital infrastructure, professional capacity building, and pilot projects will strengthen local adaptability, ensuring the effective execution of LVC mechanisms.
Conclusion & Implications:
The successful implementation of LVC in Iran could guide the country’s urban development toward a more sustainable and equitable model. By adapting international best practices to local conditions, Iran can address challenges posed by urbanization and economic constraints. Strengthening legal frameworks, empowering local authorities, fostering public-private partnerships, and emphasizing social justice will be crucial for LVC adoption. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and urban planners seeking to create a more inclusive and sustainable urban development model in Iran.
Keywords
Financing
Land Value Capture (LVC)
PEST Analysis Urban Infrastructure
Subjects
References
Alonso, W. (2005). Location and Land Use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Alterman, R. (2012). Land use regulations and property values: The Windfalls Capture idea revisited. Chapter in: The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning (Nancy Brooks, Kieran Donaghy, and Gerrit-Jan Knaap, eds.), 755-786.
Amigo, I. (2021). Building value: In Brazil, land value capture supports the needs of the community. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/articles/2021-01-building-value-in-brazil -land-value-capture-supports-community-needs/.
Aveline-Dubach, N., & Blandeau, G. (2019). The political economy of transit value capture: The changing business model of the MTRC in Hong Kong. Urban Studies, 56(16), 3415-3431.‏
DOI:10.1177/0042098018821519.
Biderman, C. (2021). Value capture and the role of land in the equality of opportunities: The case of São Paulo, Brazil. Working Paper, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/working-papers/value-capture-role-land-in-equality-opportunities/.
Cervero, R., & Murakami, J. (2008). Rail+Property development: A model of sustainable transit finance and urbanism.
Christodoulou, A., & Cullinane, K. (2019). Identifying the main opportunities and challenges from the implementation of a port energy management system: A SWOT/PESTLE analysis. Sustainability, 11(21), 6046.
DOI:10.3390/su11216046.
Clarke, W., and J. Evans. (2000). Development impact fees and the acquisition of infrastructure.
Du, H., & Mulley, C. (2007). The short-term land value impacts of urban rail transit: Quantitative evidence from Sunderland, UK. Land Use Policy, 24(1), 223-233.
Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.12.003.
Fatahian, M., Nooraie, H. and Nasr Esfahani, R. (2024). Meta-Synthesis of land value capture (LVC) mechanism and its instruments. urban economics, Vol. 9, Issue 2.
Doi: 10.22108/ue.2024.142669.1296. [In Persian]
Gong, W., Li, J., & Ng, M. K. (2021). Deciphering property development around high-speed railway stations through land value capture: Case studies in Shenzhen and Hong Kong. Sustainability, 13(22), 12605.
DOI:10.3390/su132212605.
Healey, P., M. Purdue, and F. Ennis. (1995). Negotiating Development: Rationales and Practice for Development Obligations and Planning Gain. London: E & FN Spon.
Hendricks, A., Lacoere, P., Krabben, E., & Oorschot, C. (2021). Limits of negotiable developer obligations. Sustainability, 13, 11364.
DOI:10.3390/su132011364.
Holland, A. C. (2022). Distributive Impacts and Support for Mass Transportation Projects: An Experimental Evaluation in Bogotá, Colombia. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Karimi, Nasrin., Akbari, N. and Farahmand, Sh. (2024). Financing urban infrastructure in Iran's Metropolises with emphasis on city size: The case of Isfahan Metropolis. Economic Research and Perspectives, 24(1), 135-161. doi: 10.22034/24.1.135. [In Persian]
Kim, J. (2018). CEPACs and Their Value Capture Viability in the US for Infrastructure Funding. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Kim, M. (2020). Upzoning and value capture: How US local governments use land use regulation power to create and capture value from real estate developments. Land Use Policy, 95, 104624.
Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104624.
Korngold, G. (2022). Land Value Capture in the United States: Funding Infrastructure and Local Government Services (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 2022). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (Cambridge MA), Policy Focus Reports.
Kresse, K., Kang, M., Kim, S. I., & Van der Krabben, E. (2020). Value capture ideals and practice-development stages and the evolution of value capture policies. Cities, 106, 102861.
DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102861.
Levinson, D. and E. Istrate. (2011). Access for Value: Financing Transportation Through Land Value Capture, the Brookings Institute.
https://www.brookings.edu/research/access-for-value-financing-transportation-through-land-value-capture/.
Li, C., & Aveline-Dubach, N. (2025). The limits of a success story: Rethinking the Shenzhen metro “Rail Plus Property” Model for Planning Sustainable urban transit in China. Land, 14(8), 1508.
Doi: 10.3390/land14081508.
Mahendra, A., King, R., Gray, E., Hart, M., Azeredo, L., Betti, L., ..., & Ibrahim, A. (2022). Urban land value capture in São Paulo, Addis Ababa, and Hyderabad: differing interpretations, equity impacts, and enabling conditions. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Mathur, S., and Smith, A. (2013). Land value capture to fund public transportation infrastructure: Examination of joint development projects' revenue yield and stability. Transport Policy, 30: 327-335.‏
Doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.016.
Matiashe, W., & Germond, A. (2022). Special Assessment Districts and the Financing of Infrastructure in South Africa: The Innovative Use of a Special Rating Area in Claremont, Cape Town. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
McAllister, P. (2017). The calculative turn in land value capture: Lessons from the English planning system. Land Use Policy, 63, 122-129.
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.002.
Medda, F. (2012). Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: A review. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 154-161.
Doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.07.013.
Mousavi Jahromi,Y. , Mousavi Jahromi,Y. and Zayer, A. (2008). The effects of budget deficit on private consumption & private investment in Iran. Economic Research and Perspectives, 8(3), 1-19. [In Persian]
Oppio, A., Torrieri, F., and Bianconi, M. (2018). Land value capture by urban development agreements: the case of lombardy region (Italy). In New Metropolitan Perspectives: Local Knowledge and Innovation Dynamics Towards Territory Attractiveness Through the Implementation of Horizon. /E2020/Agenda2030–Volume 1 (pp. 346-353). Springer International Publishing.
Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92099-340.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Financing transportation infrastructure through land value capture: Concepts, tools, and case studies (OECD Regional Development Papers). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/05/financing-transportation-infrastructure-through-land-value-capture_81e09399/8015065d-en.pdf.
Ortega, R. G., Rodríguez, M. D. O., Vázquez, M. L., Ricardo, J. E., Figueiredo, J. A. S., & Smarandache, F. (2019). Pestel analysis based on neutrosophic cognitive maps and neutrosophic numbers for the sinos river basin management. Infinite Study.
Pan, W., Chen, L., & Zhan, W. (2019). PESTEL analysis of construction productivity enhancement strategies: A case study of three economies. Journal of management in engineering, 35(1), 05018013.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000662.
Rolon, A. (2008). Evaluation of value capture mechanisms from linkage capture to special assessment districts. Transportation Research Record 2079 (1): 127-135.‏
Doi: 10.3141/2079-16.
Smith, J. J., & Gihring, T. A. (2006). Financing transit systems through value capture: An annotated bibliography. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(3), 751-786.
DOI:10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00474.x.
Smolka, M. O. (2013). Implementing value capture in Latin America: Policies and tools for urban development. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Sorensen, A. (2000). Land readjustment and metropolitan growth: An examination of suburban land development and urban sprawl in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 53(4), 217-330.
DOI:10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00002-7.
Sun, J., Chen, T., Cheng, Z., Wang, C. C., & Ning, X. (2017). A financing mode of Urban Rail transit based on land value capture: A case study in Wuhan City. Transport Policy, 57, 59-67.‏
Doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.014.
The Economist (2015), Building works, https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2015/08/27/building-works.
UN-Habitat. (2018). Global experiences in land readjustment: Urban legal case studies, Volume 7. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019-05/global_experiences_in_land_readjustment_urban_legal_case_studies_volume_7_1.pdf.
Van der Krabben, E., Samsura, A., & Wang, J. (2022). Financing transit oriented development by value capture: Negotiating better public infrastructure. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Vejchodská, E., & Hendricks, A. (2023). Munich’s developer obligations as a legal transplant to the Czech institutional context. Town Planning Review, 94(2), 193-214.
DOI:10.3828/tpr.2021.28.
Vejchodská, E., Barreira, A. P., Auziņš, A., Jürgenson, E., Fowles, S., & Maliene, V. (2022). Bridging land value capture with land rent narratives. Land Use Policy, 114, 105956.
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105956.
Vickrey, W. S. (1969). Congestion theory and transport investment. American Economic Review, 59, 251-260. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1823678.
Walter, I. (2016). The infrastructure finance challenge. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2841281.
Wang, J., Samsura, D. A. A., & van der Krabben, E. (2019). Institutional barriers to financing transit-oriented development in China: Analyzing informal land value capture strategies. Transport Policy, 82, 1-10.
Doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.07.010.
World Bank. (2019). Land readjustment in Japan: Case study. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/481571569562840686/pdf/Land-Readjustment-in-Japan-Case-Study.pdf.
World Economic Forum. (2014). Infrastructure Investment Policy Blueprint, World Economic Forum, Geneva.
https://www.weforum.org/reports/infrastructure-investment-policy-blueprint.