پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

بررسی اثر فقر بر تخریب محیط زیست در استان‌های ایران با رویکرد پانل فضایی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، توسعه اقتصادی، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
2 استادیار، اقتصاد منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
3 دانشیار، اقتصاد شهری و اقتصادسنجی، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
4 دانشجوی دکتری توسعه اقتصادی، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
چکیده
فقر، نابرابری، توزیع ناعادلانه درآمد و بحران‌های به‌وجود آمده از آن مانند تخریب محیط‌زیست از مشکلاتی هستند که جامعه بشری را هم در کشورهای توسعه‌یافته و هم درحال توسعه تحت تاثیر قرار داده است. از جمله پیامدهای اصلی ناشی از تخریب محیط زیست، عبارتند از کمبود آب، آلودگی هوا، فرسایش خاک، جنگل‌زدایی، از بین رفتن تنوع زیستی و تغییرات اقلیمی ناشی از گرم شدن کره زمین است. در این پژوهش، نخست‌ از روش تحلیل مولفه‌های اصلی، شاخص تخریب محیط زیست از ترکیب 6 عامل کمبود آب، آلودگی آب، آلودگی هوا، آلودگی خاک، جنگل‌زدایی و تغییرات اقلیمی استخراج شد که بنظر می‌رسد کار نخست داخلی باشد. هدف از این مقاله، بررسی تاثیر فقر بر تخریب محیط‌زیست به واسطه مجموعه‌ای از مجرا‌های اثرگذاری مانند عوامل نهادی، مقررات بازدارنده و قیمت انرژی به‌طور همزمان در استان‌های ایران طی دوره زمانی 1399-1390 با الگوی داده‌های پانل فضایی است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد فقر اثر مثبت و معنی داری بر میزان تخریب محیط زیست در همان استان دارد و اثر مثبت و معنی داری بر میزان تخریب محیط زیست در استان‌های مجاور (سرریز) می‌گذارد. همچنین، متغیرهای درآمد سرانه و کیفیت نهادی، تاثیر منفی و معنی داری بر میزان تخریب محیط زیست استان‌های هدف و مجاور دارند، به عبارت دیگر باعث بهبود محیط زیست در استا‌ن‌های دیگر خواهد شد، در حالی که متغیر قیمت انرژی و مقررات بازدارنده تاثیر مثبت و معنی داری داشته اند. لذا سیاستگذاری پیرامون کاهش فقر، بهبود کیفیت نهادی و مقررات بازدارنده در یک استان، اثرات قابل توجهی نیز در استان‌های دیگر دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Effect of Poverty on Environmental Degradation in Iranian Provinces Using a Spatial Panel Approach

نویسندگان English

Morteza Afghah 1
Yaghoub Andayesh 2
Amin Mansouri 3
azin khoramzadeh 4
1 Associate Professor, Economic Development, Department of Economics, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Natural Resources, Department of Economics, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Econometrics, Department of Economics, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
4 Ph.D Candidate of Economic Development, Department of Economics, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz,Iran
چکیده English

Poverty, inequality, and the unequal distribution of income—along with the resulting crises such as environmental degradation—are among the most pressing challenges facing both developed and developing countries. Environmental degradation manifests in numerous forms, including water scarcity, air pollution, soil erosion, deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and climate change driven by global warming. Using principal component analysis (PCA), this study constructs an environmental degradation index by integrating six key indicators: water scarcity, water pollution, air pollution, soil pollution, deforestation, and climate change. This approach appears to represent the first domestically conducted effort of its kind. The primary aim of this study is to examine the effect of poverty on environmental degradation through various transmission channels—including institutional factors, restrictive regulations, and energy prices—across Iranian provinces from 2010 to 2019 using a spatial panel data model. The findings reveal that poverty has a positive and statistically significant impact on environmental degradation within a province, as well as on degradation in neighboring provinces. Conversely, per capita income and institutional quality exhibit a significant negative relationship with environmental degradation, contributing to environmental improvement locally and regionally. On the other hand, energy prices and restrictive regulations show a positive and statistically significant relationship with environmental degradation. These results underscore the regional interdependence of environmental policies, highlighting that poverty reduction strategies, institutional reforms, and the design of regulatory frameworks in one province can generate significant spillover effects in adjacent regions.

Aim and Introduction

The objective of this article is to investigate the influence of poverty on environmental degradation through a set of interrelated channels—including institutional quality, restrictive regulations, and energy prices—across Iranian provinces from 2010 to 2019, using a spatial panel data framework.

Poverty, inequality, and unfair distribution of income, along with their associated socio-environmental crises, pose significant challenges to both developed and developing nations. Among the key consequences of environmental degradation are water scarcity, air and soil pollution, deforestation, biodiversity loss, and climate change caused by global warming.

In this study, an environmental degradation index is developed using PCA to combine six critical environmental indicators: water scarcity, water pollution, air pollution, soil pollution, deforestation, and climate change. To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes the first domestic application of PCA for constructing such an index in Iran.

Methodology

Environmental degradation in this study encompasses six variables: water scarcity, water pollution, soil pollution, air pollution, deforestation, and climate change. To enable the use of multiple environmental indicators simultaneously, we construct a composite index via principal component analysis (PCA) that captures the multidimensional nature of environmental degradation.

Given the spatial interdependence of environmental outcomes across provinces, we employ spatial econometric techniques. When each observation is geographically dependent on neighboring regions, conventional econometric models become inadequate due to the complexity and volume of parameters involved. The spatial panel model accounts for this by integrating spatial lags and spillover effects, allowing for a more accurate assessment of inter-provincial interactions.

Findings

The spillover effects resulting from a 1% sudden change in the per capita income rate in neighboring provinces are greater than those stemming from the same change within Khodi Province. The net outcome is a 1.85% change in environmental quality, either as degradation or improvement, depending on the direction of the change.

Similarly, the spillover effects caused by a 1% sudden change in the poverty index in neighboring provinces exceed the direct effects within the home province and occur in the same direction. The overall result is a 0.49% degradation in environmental quality.

In contrast, a 1% sudden change in energy prices in Khodi Province has stronger environmental spillover effects than similar changes in neighboring provinces. The net result is a 2% degradation in the environment.

The spillover effects from a 1% sudden change in institutional quality within Khodi Province are more significant than those from neighboring provinces. This results in a 0.35% degradation in the environment.

Finally, the spillover effects caused by a 1% sudden change in restrictive environmental regulations within Khodi Province are stronger than those from neighboring provinces. The outcome is a 0.65% improvement in environmental quality.

Discussion and Conclusion

The results of the spatial econometric models indicate that rising poverty in a region can lead to the spread of environmental degradation through economic, social, and environmental interconnections with neighboring provinces. These findings support the poverty-environment trap theory, which highlights a bidirectional relationship between poverty and overreliance on natural resources.

One of the most significant findings of this study is the negative and statistically significant effect of institutional quality on environmental degradation. Provinces with higher institutional quality tend to implement more effective policies and strategies that mitigate environmental harm. Strong institutions enhance economic productivity and promote the efficient use of natural resources by improving monitoring, ensuring law enforcement, and fostering transparency in resource allocation.

Per capita income also exhibits a negative and significant impact on environmental degradation. Higher per capita income improves economic well-being and raises public awareness about environmental issues, leading to shifts in consumption behavior and greater investment in clean technologies. This result aligns with the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, which posits that at higher levels of income, environmental degradation tends to decrease.

Unexpectedly, the results show that higher energy prices are positively and significantly associated with environmental degradation. This suggests inefficiencies in Iran’s energy pricing policies. Increased energy prices may encourage the illegal use of polluting alternatives or reduce access to clean energy, thereby exacerbating environmental damage. These findings highlight the urgent need to revise national energy policies.

Another notable result is the positive effect of restrictive environmental regulations on degradation. This implies that the mere existence or proliferation of environmental laws does not necessarily improve environmental outcomes. Instead, the quality of regulation and the effectiveness of implementation are crucial. Laws without proper enforcement mechanisms or monitoring systems may inadvertently worsen environmental conditions.

In summary, the study finds that poverty has a positive and significant impact on environmental degradation, with effects that extend beyond provincial borders. Conversely, institutional quality and per capita income have negative and significant effects, suggesting that improvements in these variables can enhance environmental outcomes. On the other hand, increases in energy prices and the implementation of restrictive regulations—when not properly enforced—are linked to environmental degradation

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Energy prices
Institutional quality
provinces of Iran
Restrictive Regulations
( References)
Aghaei, M., & rezagholizadeh, M. (2016). Investigation the Direct and Indirect Impact of Energy Consumption in Selective Sectors on Ppoverty and Inequality in Iran. Iranian Energy Economics, 5(19), 1-51 doi.org/10.22054/jiee.2017.7303.[In Persian]
Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Yang, X., Hussain, N., & Sinha, A. (2022). Financial development and environmental degradation: do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? Gondwana Research, 105, 299-310.‏ DOI:10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012
Ahmadianm Majid, Abdoli, Ghahreman, Jebel Ameli, Farkhondeh, Shabankhah, Mahmood & Khorasani, Seyed Adel. (2017) Effect of Environment Degradation on Economic Growth (evidence from 32 developing Countres). Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 7(27), 17-28. [In Persian]
Ahmadi Niyaz, Sadaf, Zeinalzadeh, Reza, & Raeispour Rajabali, Ali. (2019). Study of Good Governance Effect on Environment Quality Index in Selected Developing Countries. Journal Of Science and Technology , 20(4 (79) ), 165-177. [In Persian]
Amirnejad, Hamid, Zargartalebi, Mohamad & Roshanfar, Mohamad Ali. (2015). The Relationship Between Carbon Dioxide Emissions And Energy Consumption And Environmental Destruction In Iran. Agricultural Economics: Iranian Journal Of Agricultural Economics (Economics And Agriculture Journal), 9(4 ), 177-195. [In Persian]
Ansari Samani H, Rouzbahani M, Dalvandi H, Sadeghi R. Income inequality and environmental degradation in the provinces of Iran. Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2024; 11 (1) :25-30[In Persian]
Ardakani, Mohammad Zaker, & Arashpour, Alireza. (2022). Investigating the Fundamental Principle of Deterrence in International Environmental Law. Journal Of Science and Technology 23(12 (115) ), 55-63. doi.:10.30495/jest.2019.45943.4756. [In Persian]
ASADI, H., Besharati, H., & Gorji, M.. (2022). Challenges and Limitations of Soil and Land Resources in Iran. Journal Of Land Management, 10(suppl 1 ), 111-134.doi: 10.22092/lmj.2022.358760.309 [In Persian]
Azizi, A., & Pourasghar Sangachin, F. (2022). Investigating the Relationship between Poverty and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) in Countries with Different Incomes. Journal of Applied Sociology, 33(2), 117-136. Doi: 10.22108/jas.2021.129190.2128 [In Persian]
Bondori, A. , & khosravipour, B. (2023). Investigating the Effect of Rural Poverty on the Destruction of Zagros Forests. Geography and Human Relationships, 6(1), 116-139. doi: 10.22034/gahr.2023.396123.1866[In Persian]
Cao, S., & Zheng, H. (2016). Climate change adaptation to escape the poverty trap: role of the private sector. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2(10), e01244. DOI: 10.1002/ehs2.1244
Dada, J. T., Ajide, F. M., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). The moderating role of financial development in energy poverty–sustainable environment linkages: evidence from Africa. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(4), 924-944.
Davood Behboodi , Esmail Barghi, (2009). Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Effects on Environment in Iran (1967-2004), Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 5(4), 35. DOI:10.22099/ijes.2017.23649.1292. [In Persian]
Duraiappah, A. (1996). Poverty and environmental degradation: a literature review and analysis.‏ doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00100-4
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hendizadeh, H., Karbasi, A & Mohammadzadeh, H. (2018). Spatial analysis of factors affecting rural poverty and its relationship with environmental degradation case: Qaenat city. Spatial Economics and Rural Development, 7(1(23)), 131-148 . [In Persian]
Hunjra, A. I., Azam, M., Bruna, M. G., & Bouri, E. (2023). A cross-regional investigation of institutional quality and sustainable development. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 84, 101758.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101758
IMF. (2013). Energy subsidy reform: Lessons and implications. International Monetary Fund.
Jafari Nasab Kermani, Muhaddith. 2017. "Investigating the dynamic effects of income inequality and economic growth on environmental degradation in Iran: the structural vector autoregression model". Economic development and planning. Supervisor: Mohammadreza Lotfalipour. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [In Persian]
Jalali, Mohamad, Afshari, Maryam, & Mazinanian, Zeinab. (2021). Environmental Impact of Climate Change on National Security. Journal Of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(9 (100) ), 179-190. [In Persian]
Khan, Z., Ali, S., Dong, K., & Li, R. Y. M. (2021). How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital. Energy Economics, 94, 105060.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105060
Kirsten, F., Bonga-Bonga, L., & Biyase, M. (2024). Escaping the poverty-environment trap: exploring the nonlinear relationship between poverty and environmental concern in the Southern African Development Community Countries.
Mahboubeh Soleimanpouromran, Fariba Alidadiyani, Hamidreza Sodagar, (2017). Environment, Politics and Globalization A Historical Review on Environmental Theories, Journal of Environment and Interdisciplinary Development, 2(58), 43-56. [In Persian]
Majed V, Safari Asl S. 05 Impact of Productivity and Institutional Quality on Environmental Quality (Evidences from Developing Economies) . qjerp 2019; 27 (89) :139-162 [In Persian]
Mobarak A, Hojabr Kiani K, Memarnejad A, Peykarjou K. (2018). Investigating the Effects of Institutional Quality and Human Capital On Economic Growth. JPBUD. 23(1), 117-146.[In Persian]
Nasrollahi, Zahra, & Ghafari Golak, Marzieh. (2011). The Relationship between Air Pollution And Economic Growth In 28 Provinces Of Iran (The Case Study Of CO, SO2 And NOX). Knowledge And Development, 17(33), 164-182. doi.org/10.22067/pm.v17i33.27310 [In Persian]
Nazari,R, Mahdavi, Adeli, Dadgar, (2015). Study of the Factors Influenced Environment Pollution in Iran During 1974-2013, Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 6(21), 47-60. [In Persian]
Nikoukar, Afsaneh. (2021). Investigating the Factors Affecting Rural Poverty in Provinces of Iran. . Agricultural Economics: Iranian Journal Of Agricultural Economics (Economics And Agriculture Journal) 15(1 ), 89-111.DOI: 10.22034/iaes.2021.527495.1835 [In Persian]
Nonejad, M., & Rouzitalab., A (2018). The Effects of Economic Growth and Energy Consumption on Environmental Pollution: A Case Study of Iran. Journal of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, 2(3), 99-124. DOI: 10.22054/eenr.2017.9069. [In Persian]
Parry, I. W. H., Heine, D., Lis, E., & Li, S. (2014). Getting energy prices right: From principle to practice. International Monetary Fund.
Prakash, S. (2009). Poverty and environment linkages in mountains and uplands: reflections on the ‘poverty trap’thesis. 1997.‏
Rahmani Fazli,H. Nikbakht, S. Molabahrami, A (2019). The Effect of the Budget on Regional Inequality of Iran Using Panel Spatial Econometrics Model, Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 27(89), 399-430. [In Persian]
Rakshit, B., Jain, P., Sharma, R. et al(2023).. An empirical investigation of the effects of poverty and urbanization on environmental degradation: the case of sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 51887–51905 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25266-4
Rosignoli, F. (2024). Linking Energy Poverty, Environmental Justice and Forced Displacement: Controversies and Ways Forward. In: Iglesias Márquez, D., Esteve-Jordà, C., Felipe Pérez, B. (eds) Legal Challenges at the End of the Fossil Fuel Era. Global Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61766-9_5
Shahbazi, K., Hamidi Razi, D., & Feshari, M. (2015). Investigating the Factors Affecting Air Pollution Emissions in Caspian Sea Countries: Panel Spatial Durbin Model. Journal of Environmental Studies, 41(1), 107-127. doi: 10.22059/jes.2015.53904 [In Persian]
Sterner, T. (2007). Fuel taxes: An important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy, 35(6), 3194-3202.
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development. Pearson education.‏ Web: www.pearson.com/uk
UNDP. (2020). Human Development Report 2020: The next frontier - Human development and the Anthropocene. United Nations Development Programme.
URL: http://ehemj.com/article-1-1301-en.html
Wahyunengseh, R. D. & Hastjarjo, S. (2024). Interconnections of Environmental Issues, Poverty, and Media: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis (2016-2022). Oppor Chall. Sustain., 3(3), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.56578/ocs030304