پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

تحلیل اثر استحکام حقوق قانونی وام بر اشتغال آسیب‌پذیر در کشورهای عضو اوپک (رویکرد رگرسیون انتقال ملایم تابلویی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته علوم اقتصادی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
2 استادیار گروه اقتصاد، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه الکوت، واسط، عراق
4 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
چکیده
اشتغال آسیب‌پذیر، بخشی از اقتصاد غیررسمی و شامل کسب‌و‌کارهای خانگی است که در پی عدم امکان استخدام و ورود به مشاغل رسمی، شکل می‌گیرد و به‎دلیل برخوردار نبودن از مزایایی همچون بیمه درمان و تأمین اجتماعی، پاداش و حقوق بازنشستگی، منجر به آسیب‌پذیری شاغلان آن و تلاش برای دستیابی به‌ وام و تسهیلات بانکی برای راه‌اندازی و ارتقاء فعالیت‌ها و انتقال به بخش رسمی می‌شود. بانک‌ها نیز به‌عنوان تأمین‌کنندگان وام به‌منظور اطمینان از بازگشت منابع وام داده شده، وثیقه‌هایی را از وام‌گیرندگان درخواست می‌کنند که اغلب به‌صورت اسناد ملکی هستند. استحکام یافتن حقوق قانونی وام در مورد وثیقه‌های بانکی منجر به اطمینان بیشتر بانک‌ها برای وام‌دهی می‌شود. به‌دلیل تک‌محصولی بودن اقتصاد کشورهای صادرکننده نفت، اتکا به درآمدهای نفتی و عدم برخورداری از زیرساخت‌های تولیدی قوی که منجر به ایجاد مشاغل کافی در بخش رسمی باشد، هدف از تدوین مقاله حاضر، تحلیل اثر استحکام حقوق قانونی وام بر اشتغال آسیب‌پذیر در کشورهای عضو اوپک طی دوره 2021-2013 می‌باشد. بدین منظور، از روش رگرسیون انتقال ملایم تابلویی (PSTR) استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد، شاخص استحکام حقوق قانونی وام، دارای حد آستانه‌ای برابر با 22/6 درصد و دو رژیم حدی است. استحکام حقوق قانونی وام در رژیم اول، بر اشتغال آسیب‌پذیر، بی‌تأثیر بوده و در رژیم دوم، بر آن اثر منفی داشته است که نشان می‌دهد، با افزایش این شاخص، انتقال از بخش آسیب‌پذیر به بخش رسمی صورت گرفته است. همچنین درآمد نفت و درصد ثبت‌نام در مقطع متوسطه، اثر منفی و نسبت جمعیت شهرنشین به کل جمعیت، اثر مثبت بر اشتغال آسیب‌پذیر داشته‌اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the Effect of the Strength of Legal Rights Index on Vulnerable Employment in OPEC Member Countries: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach

نویسندگان English

Firas Sabah Alivi 1
Sara Ghobadi 2
Saad Makassees 3
Hossein Sharifi Renani 4
1 Ph.D. student in Economics, Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Alkut University, waset, Iraq
4 Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

Aim and Introduction: 
Vulnerable employment, a segment of the informal economy, includes home-based businesses that emerge due to a lack of opportunities for formal employment. These businesses often operate without essential benefits such as medical insurance, social security, bonuses, and pensions, which exposes workers to economic instability. Consequently, many individuals engaged in vulnerable employment seek loans and financial assistance to expand their business activities and transition to the formal sector. Banks, as the primary providers of such loans, request collateral from borrowers – typically in the form of property documents – to ensure repayment and mitigate financial risk. Strengthening legal rights related to loan collateral enhances banks’ confidence in issuing loans, thereby increasing access to credit for vulnerable workers.
Due to the oil-dependent nature of OPEC economies and their reliance on oil revenues, many of these countries often lack robust production infrastructures capable of generating sufficient formal employment opportunities. This study aims to analyze the effect of strengthening loan-related legal rights on vulnerable employment in OPEC member countries, including Iran, Iraq, Algeria, Angola, Congo, Gabon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, Guinea, Libya, and Nigeria, during the period from 2013 to 2021.
Methodology: 
Following the approach of Herkenhoff et al. (2021), this study employs a model in which the independent variables include the strength of legal rights related to loans, oil revenues, secondary school enrollment rates, and the urbanization ratio. Given the study’s objective of analyzing the threshold effects of legal loan rights on vulnerable employment, the Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR[A1] ) method is used to estimate the model.
Results and Discussion: 
The analysis identifies a 6.22% threshold in the legal rights index, distinguishing two distinct regimes. In the first regime, the strength of legal loan rights does not significantly impact vulnerable employment. However, in the second regime, a higher index value reduces vulnerable employment, suggesting that more substantial legal loan rights facilitate the transition of workers from the vulnerable to the formal sector. Additionally, oil revenues and secondary school enrollment rates exhibit a negative effect on vulnerable employment, while the urbanization ratio has a positive effect.
Conclusion:
The findings of this study indicate that strengthening legal loan rights has contributed to a reduction in vulnerable employment, which is a subset of informal employment. This shift has contributed to growth in formal sector employment.  Banking regulations and enhanced requirements for obtaining collateral have increased banks’ confidence in lending, as they are better able to mitigate the risk of non-repayment. However, this system primarily benefits individuals who can pledge valid collateral, such as real estate and housing documents. Given the high value of such collateralized assets, borrowers are more likely to invest their loans in business development, transitioning their employment from the informal to the formal sector. In addition to securing stable employment, they also gain access to social benefits such as insurance and social security. This financial stability enables them to make timely loan repayments, preventing defaults and preserving their financial credibility.
Based on these findings, it is recommended that governments and banking authorities in the investigated countries implement strict laws and regulations to guarantee loan security and identify factors contributing to bank insolvency. Such measures would help prevent financial resource mismanagement in the banking sector and reduce the probability of bank failures. Strengthening financial regulations and risk management strategies would facilitate lending, ultimately promoting employment growth in the formal sector and reducing the prevalence of vulnerable employment.
Furthermore, the study reveals that oil revenues negatively impact vulnerable employment, which may be attributed to increased government spending on productive investments and formal job creation. This suggests that redirecting oil revenues toward investment, production, and employment generation—rather than short-term expenditures—can facilitate the transition of workers from the informal to the formal sector. Thus, policymakers are encouraged to prioritize long-term economic strategies that allocate oil revenues to sectors that foster sustainable employment opportunities.
The findings also highlight the positive effect of education on labor force transition. Higher levels of education and training result in a more skilled workforce, increasing their acceptance and employability in formal job markets. Therefore, governments should allocate additional resources to public education, provide free schooling, and expand access to higher education for economically disadvantaged groups. Promoting scientific education and fostering a culture that values learning can further enhance workforce skills and economic mobility.
Finally, the study finds that urbanization has had a positive effect on vulnerable employment, indicating that increasing urbanization has not been accompanied by industrial advancements or skill development, thereby failing to support the expansion of the formal sector. Instead, urbanization in the studied countries has often been driven by unfavorable business environments, weak regulatory frameworks, and a lack of political transparency, contributing to the growth of the informal economy. To address these challenges, policymakers should focus on improving governance, strengthening legal and economic structures, and fostering a business-friendly environment that supports formal employment.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Legal Rights Strength Index. Panel Smooth Transition Regression
Vulnerable Employment
Abdi, E. T., A., & tavakoli, J. (2019). Assessing the impact of government’s microfinance on the entrepreneurship and sustainable rural development of Javanrud. Social Development & Welfare Planning, 10(40), 177-216. [In Persian] 
Acosta, R., & Cortés, J. (2022). Loans and employment: Evidence from bank-specific liquidity shocks. Latin American Journal of Central Banking, 3(2), 100059.
Annabestani, A.A., Mahmoudi, H. (2019). Analysis of the effect of Imam Khomeini Relief Committee loans on the sustainable employment of villagers in the case of Mashhad city. Space Economy and Rural Development, 
8(3), 129-150. [In Persian]
Baklouti, N., & Boujelbene, Y. (2020). A simultaneous equation model of economic growth and shadow economy: Is there a difference between the developed and developing countries? Economic Change and Restructuring, 53, 151-170.
Bazzoli, A., & Probst, T. M. (2023). Vulnerable workers in insecure jobs: A critical meta‐synthesis of qualitative findings. Applied Psychology, 72(1), 85-105.
Becker, G. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. NBER, New York, NY.
Burchell, B., Deakin, S., & Honey, S. (1999). The employment status of individuals in non-standard employment (Vol. 110). London: Department of Trade and Industry.
Cabegin, E.C., Dacuycuy, L. and Alba, M. (2010). Stubborn Unemployment and Employment Vulnerability in the Midst of Economic Growth: The Philippine Case. Dlsu Angelo King Institute for Economic and Business Studies, Manila, PH.
Cantore, N., Antimiani, A., & Anciaes, P. R. (2012). Energy price shocks: Sweet and sour consequences in developing countries. Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper 355.
Castree, N. (2007). Labour geography: A work in progress. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 853-862.
Chen, M., Huang, X., Cheng, J., Tang, Z., & Huang, G. (2023). Urbanization and vulnerable employment: Empirical evidence from 163 countries in 1991-2019. Cities, 135, 104208.
Cheraghi, H., cheraghi, A., & pourafkari, N. (2015). The effect of self-employment loans on stable employment of Abadan Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation Aid Recipients. Quarterly Journal of Social Development (Previously Human Development), 9(2), 203-216. [In Persian]
Colletaz, G., & Hurlin, C. (2006). Threshold effects of the public capital productivity: an international panel smooth transition approach. Document de Recherche, https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00008056/
Datta, S., & Sahu, T. N. (2021). Impact of microcredit on employment generation and empowerment of rural women in India. International Journal of Rural Management, 17(1), 140-157.
Doeringer, P. and Piore, M. (1971). Internal Labour Markets and Manpower Analysis. Heath, Lexington, MA.
Elgin, C., & Oyvat, C. (2013). Lurking in the cities: Urbanization and the informal economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 36-47.
Faaliat, V. & Khareghani, N. (2011). Investigating the impact of microloans on employment (a case study of Iran). Work and Society, 141: 22-44. [In Persian]
Farzanegan, M. R., & Markwardt, G. (2009). The effects of oil price shocks on the Iranian economy. Energy Economics, 31(1), 134-151.
Fudge, J. (2005). Beyond vulnerable workers: Towards a new standard employment relationship. Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal. LJ, 12, 151.
Gangopadhyay, P., & Shankar, S. (2016). Labour (im) mobility and monopsonistic exploitation of workers in the urban informal sector: Lessons from a field study. Urban Studies, 53(5), 1042-1060.
García, D. (2020). Employment in the Great Recession: How important were household credit supply shocks?. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52(1), 165-203.
Ghorbani, M., & Hassani, L. (2018). Investigating the relationship between credit and self-employment projects using multilevel modeling (case study Mazandaran province). Agricultural Economics Research, 9(36), 191-208. 
[In Persian]
Gokhool, S., Kasseeah, H., & Tandrayen-Ragoobur, V. (2018). Vulnerable employment in Mauritius: Experience of an upper-middle-income country. International Journal of Development Issues, 17(2), 187-204.
Gonzalez, A., Teräsvirta, T., Van Dijk, D., & Yang, Y. (2017). Panel smooth transition regression models. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 604, Stockholm School of Economics.
Guti´errez-Romero, R. (2021). Inequality, persistence of the informal economy, and club convergence. World Development, 139.
Haqiqi, I., & Bahalou, M. (2013). Macroeconomic impacts of export barriers in a dynamic CGE model. Journal of money and economy, 3, 117-150.
Herkenhoff, K., Phillips, G. M., & Cohen-Cole, E. (2021). The impact of consumer credit access on self-employment and entrepreneurship. Journal of financial economics, 141(1), 345-371.
Herkenhoff, K., Phillips, G. M., & Cohen-Cole, E. (2021). The impact of consumer credit access on self-employment and entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(1), 345-371.
Hill, S. (2015). Non-standard forms of employment-report for discussion at the meeting of experts on non-standard forms of employment. Geneva: ILO.
Huang, G., Zhang, H., Xue, D., & Yao, H. (2019). The inverted-U relationship between urban informal economy and urbanization in China. Economic Geography, 39, 76-83.
Hulme, D., & Mosley, P. (1996). Why credit markets fail the poor. Finance against poverty, 1, 16-41.
International Labour Organization. (2010). Global Employment Trends. ILO, Geneva.
International Labour Organization. (2012). Global Employment Trends. 2012, ILO, Geneva.
International Labour Organization. (2014). Global Employment Trends: Risk of a Jobless Recovery?. ILO, Geneva.
International Labour Organization. (2014). Global Employment Trends: Risk of a Jobless Recovery?. International Labour Organization, Geneva.
International Labour Organization. (2020). ILO modelled estimates database, ILOSTAT. Retrieved from: https://ilostat.ilo.org/data.
International Labour Organization. (2020). Informal employment (% of total non-agricultural employment). Retrieved from:
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.ISV.IFRM.ZS.
James, J., Marsh, I., & Sarno, L. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of exchange rates. John Wiley & Sons.
Kabiri Shahabad, H., & Issaei Tafreshi, M. (2019). The role of collateral against the asymmetric information phenomenon in the bank lending market and the requisite for effectively play the role in movable collaterals. Private Law Research, 8(28), 171-196. [In Persian]
Kadilli, A., & Markov, N. (2012). A panel smooth transition regression model for the determinants of inflation expectations and credibility in the ECB and the recent financial crisis. Available at: SSRN 1903853.
Kalleberg, A. L., & Sorensen, A. B. (1979). The sociology of labor markets. Annual review of sociology, 5(1), 351-379.
Kalleberg, A.L. (2011). Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s-2000s. Rssel Sage Foundation, New York, NY.
Kunda, G., Barley, S. R., & Evans, J. (2002). Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly skilled technical professionals in a contingent labor market. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 55(2), 234-261.
Lakemann, T. (2023). How vulnerable are the self-employed? Evidence from Ugandan small-scale entrepreneurs. The Journal of Development Studies, 59(9), 1391-1408.
Manian, Z., & Mousavi, A.A.S. (2015). Employment security and its measurement indicators. Work and Society, 182: 4-25. [In Persian]
Olsthoorn, M. (2014). Measuring precarious employment: A proposal for two indicators of precarious employment based on set-theory and tested with Dutch labor market-data. Social Indicators Research, 119, 421-441.
Otobe, N. (2011). Global economic crisis, gender, and employment: The impact and policy response. Employment Working Paper No. 74, ILO, Geneva.
Palaskas, T., Psycharis, Y., Rovolis, A., & Stoforos, C. (2015). The asymmetrical impact of the economic crisis on unemployment and welfare in Greek urban economies. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(5), 973-1007.
Peck, J. (2003). Labor geographies: Workers and the landscapes of Capitalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2), 518-521.
Peel, S., & Boxall, P. (2005). When is contracting preferable to employment? An exploration of management and worker perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 42(8), 1675-1697.
Raifu, I. A., & Aminu, A. (2022). impact of oil revenue on unemployment in Nigeria. The Journal of Energy and Development, 47(1/2), 101-134.
Rauch, J. E. (1993). Economic development, urban underemployment, and income inequality. Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, Vol. 26(4), 901-918.
Rezazadeh, A., Jahangiri, S., & Mohseninia, R. (2023). The business cycle dynamics due to the presence of financial frictions in Iran: NARDL approach. Journal of Iranian Economic Issues, 10(1), 119-152. [In Persian]
Sanjari Konar Sandal, N., Elyaspour, B., & Nikooghadam, M. (2022). The asymmetric effect of oil prices, oil price uncertainty and interest rates on unemployment in Iran. Journal of Iranian Economic Issues, 9(1), 269-296. 
[In Persian] doi: 10.30465/ce.2022.41708.1798. 
Smeaton, D. (2003). Self-employed workers: Calling the shots or hesitant independents? A consideration of the trends. Work, Employment and Society, 17(2), 379-391.
Sparreboom, T., & Staneva, A. (2014). Is education the solution to decent work for youth in developing economies?: Identifying qualifications mismatch from 28 school-to-work transition surveys. Geneva, Switzerland, ILO Document, No. TD/TNC 118.
Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. A&C Black, London.
Temu, A. P. (2019). Youth’s credit accessibility and employment creation in Tanzania: A case of Kilombero District, Morogoro. Doctoral dissertation, Sokoine University of Agriculture.
Vosko, L. F. (1997). Legitimizing the triangular employment relationship: Emerging international labour standards from a comparative perspective. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 19, 43-77.
Walker, B. (2011). How does non-standard employment affect workers?: A consideration of the evidence. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 36(3), 15-30.
Weil, D. (2009). Rethinking the regulation of vulnerable work in the USA: A sector-based approach. Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(3), 411-430.
Wu, D. F., & Schneider, F. (2019). Nonlinearity between the shadow economy and level of development. In Paper presented at the IMF Working Papers 2019/048. International Monetary Fund.
Yaqoubi, J. (2005). Investigating the effects of microcredit on the employment of rural women in Zanjan province. Women's Research, 3(1): 125-146. [In Persian]