پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

بررسی منحنی لافر و کشش درآمد مشمول مالیات: تأثیر کسورات مالیاتی در یک مدل تعادل عمومی پویا

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز. شیراز، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
4 استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
کسورات مالیاتی نقش مهمی در تعیین درآمدهای مالیاتی دارد و نادیده گرفتن تأثیر آن در مطالعات مالیاتی می‏تواند منجر به نتایج گمراهکننده شود. برای پرداختن به این شکاف تحقیقاتی، این مطالعه از یک مدل تعادل عمومی پویا سهبخشی برای تخمین منحنی لافر و همچنین بررسی اثرات کسورات مالیات بر منحنی لافر و درآمد مشمول مالیات استفاده می‌کند. این تجزیه و تحلیل بر بخش‌های خانگی، تجاری و دولتی متمرکز است و اهمیت کسورات مالیاتی در هریک از این بخش‏ها را بررسی می‌کند. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که در صورت عدم وجود کسورات مالیاتی، نرخ مالیات برای حداکثر کردن درآمد مالیاتی از محل درآمد نیروی کار40 درصد و برای بازدهی سرمایه، 50 درصد است. در مقابل، هنگامی که کسورات مالیاتی وجود دارد، نرخ‏های مالیاتی بیش از 45 و 55 درصد به ترتیب درآمد مالیاتی را از محل درآمد نیروی کار و بازدهی سرمایه به حداکثر می‏رساند. همچنین نتایج مربوط به کشش درآمد مشمول مالیاتی نیروی‌کار و سرمایه، حاصل در هر سناریو تقریبا ثابت و در صورت وجود کسورات نسبت به حالت حذف آن مقداری بیشتر می‌باشد. در حالیکه کشش درآمد مالیاتی حاصل از درآمد سرمایه، به دلیل تنوع بیشتر، کسورات سرمایه‌ای، همیشه بزرگ‏تر از یک است و در هر دو حالت شیبی نزولی دارد و با افزایش نرخ مالیات به تدریج کاهش یافته و به یک نزدیک می‌شود. همچنین صرف‏نظر از وجود کسورات، درآمد مشمول مالیات مربوط به درآمد نیروی‌کار برای نرخ‌های مالیاتی کمتر از32/. است
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Laffer Curve and Taxable Revenue Elasticity: The Impact of Tax Deductions on a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model

نویسندگان English

Nahid Gohartash 1
Rouhollah shahnazi 2
Ahmad Sadraei javaheri 3
Mahboubeh Jafari 4
Parviz Rostamzadeh 4
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Economics, Department of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده English

Aim and Introduction

Making changes in the tax system is one of the basic and important needs for increasing government tax revenues. To achieve this, the tax system must move in a direction that increases the tax base. One of the most important solutions can be reducing tax exemptions and deductions. Since tax deduction plays an important role in determining tax revenues, ignoring its effect in tax studies can lead to misleading results. To address this research gap, this study uses a three-part dynamic general equilibrium model to estimate the Laffer Curve and investigate the effects of tax deductions on the curve and taxable income.

Findings

The analysis focuses on the household, business, and government sectors, highlighting the significance of tax deductions within each.

Findings from this research show that, in the absence of tax deductions, the optimal tax rate for maximizing tax revenue in terms of labor income is below 45%, while for capital income, it is below 40%. In contrast, when tax deductions are present, tax rates exceeding 50% and 55% maximize tax revenue for labor and capital income, respectively. Furthermore, the elasticity of taxable income for both labor and capital remains relatively constant across scenarios, with a slightly higher value observed when deductions are considered. Regarding capital income, the elasticity consistently exceeds 1 due to the presence of varied capital deductions. In both cases, the elasticity exhibits a downward slope, gradually decreasing as the tax rate increases and approaching a value of 1. In contrast, the ETI associated with labor income remains below 37%, regardless of the presence or absence of deductions.

Furthermore, under tax revenue elasticity, the rate of reaction to the tax rate for the labor force is almost uniform in low tax rates and has a downward trend with the increase of the tax rate in all three cases (considering and not considering deductions). But in the case of reductions in the labor force, the amount of reaction is higher than the other two cases. While the elasticity of tax income from capital gains due to capital depreciation deductions is always greater than 1 and is downward in all three cases and gradually decreases with the increase of the tax rate and approaches 1.

Methodology

In the current research, to understand the effects of tax exemptions and deductions in the economic system, an attempt has been made to analyze the effects of tax deductions on the government tax revenues and the elasticity of taxable income and tax elasticity, in a simple three-part dynamic general equilibrium model including households, firms and government, three special cases regarding the absence of tax deductions and social security premiums should be investigated. To evaluate and estimate the model, first the calibrated parameters in previous studies were collected and then the results were obtained through MATLAB software.

Discussion and Conclusion

One of the important results of this research is the changes in the government tax income and the reaction of individuals in the form of taxable income, caused by the consideration and non-consideration of deductions and tax exemptions on the household and corporate sectors.

As it can be seen, tax revenues in the scenario of removing tax deductions are more than the other two scenarios, i.e. considering deductions, on the other hand, the elasticity of taxable income in the presence of tax deductions show a greater reaction than in the case of not considering tax deductions.

Iran has been experiencing consecutive budget deficits over different periods. As a result of reduced oil revenues much greater attention has been drawn to a more efficient and effective taxing system. So, a substitution in the government revenue system can potentially deminish the over-dependence of the Iranian economy on oil revenues, which can lead to far reduced deficits both in the long and short term.

In terms of deductions and exemptions as a factor affecting tax revenues, it can display a more realistic picture of an economy and take into account the existing economic realities. Therefore, the tax system should act in such a way that it moves in the direction of expanding the tax base. One of the solutions for this is realized through elimination of tax exemptions and deductions. It seems that such policies can prevent tax evasion, collecting more tax, and ultimately increase the motivation for work and activity and cause economic growth and prosperity

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Laffer Curve
Taxable Income
General Equilibrium
Tax Deductions
Akbarpour Roshan, N. & Shahrazi, M, (2017). “The effects of Laffar deductions: a case study of the Social Security Organization of Iran”. Iranian Economic Research Quarterly,. 23(75): 102-81. Doi: 10.22054/ijer.2018.9122.(in persion).
Ansari Nasab, M., Memarzadeh., & Karimi Moghadam, A. (2017). “investigation of tax rate asymmetry on individuals, imports, wealth and income on tax evasion in the form of Laffer curve using MIMIC and Markov switching models”. The 12th Conference on Financial and Tax Policies of Iran, Tehran.(in persion).
Bayat, M., Afshari.,& Tavaklian, H. (2012). “Monetary policy and aggregate stock price index in the framework of a DSGE model”. Economic Policy and Research Quarterly, 24(78): 171-206(n persion).
Chaudhary, M. A., Anwar, S., & Siddiqui, R. (2001). “Debt Laffer Curve for South Asian countries ”.The Pakistan development review, 40(4): 705-720.‏
Ferreira‐Lopes, A., Martins, L. F., & Espanhol, R. (2020). “The relationship between tax rates and tax revenues in eurozone member countries‐exploring the Laffer curve”. Bulletin of Economic Research, 72(2): 121-145.‏
Garannejad, A., & Chapardar, E. (2011). “Investigating factors affecting tax revenues in Iran”. Financial Economics, 6(11): 69-92(in persion).
Gerd, A., & Balaie Khobestani, I. (2016). “Investigating factors affecting tax revenue collection with the approach of preventing tax evasion (Case study: General Department of Tax Affairs West of Tehran) ”. New Achievements in Humanities Studies, 5(1): 65-98(in persion).
Givati, Y. (2019). “Theories of Tax Deductions: Income Measurement versus Efficiency”. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting(Forthcoming). 107- 123.
Graetz, M J., Deborah H. S,. & Anne L. A. (2018). Federal Income Taxation: Principles and Policies (Foundation Press; 8th edition).
Gunji, H., Hiraga, K. & Miyazaki, K. (2021). “Tax Deduction Matters: Elasticities of the Laffer Curve, Taxable Income, and the Tax Revenue. Available” SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3985843 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3985843.
Jayasooriya, S. P. (2021). “Approximation of Laffer Curve: Taxation on Japanese Economic Growth”.‏ Empirical Economics Review, 10(1), ISSN 2222-9736.
Kaid, I., M., Amin Rashti, N., & Daman Kesha, M. (2012). “Investigation of the Laffer curve in Iran's tax system”. Master's thesis.
Kalmarzi, H. S., & Mousavi, M. H. (2014). “An estimation of Laffer curve in Iran: a non-linear approach”. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 3(1): 43-59.
Kaplow, L. (2007). “Optimal income transfers”. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(3), 295-325.
Koester, G., & Priesmeier, C. (2012). “Estimating dynamic tax revenue elasticities for Germany". Bundesbank Discussion Paper No. 23/2012, Available at SSRN 2796877.‏
Koester, G., & Priesmeier, C. (2012). “Estimating dynamic tax revenue elasticities for Germany”. Available at SSRN 2796877.
Lin, B., & Jia, Z. (2019). “Tax rate, government revenue and economic performance: A perspective of Laffer curve”. China Economic Review, 56: 101307.
Mahdizadeh, M., Mousavi Jahormi, Y., Gholami, E., & Sarlak, A. (2017). “Estimating the financial growth factor in Iran with an emphasis on the way oil revenues are spent”, Financial Economy, 12(43): 21-48 (in persion).
Mai, H. L. T., & Van, H. T. (2021). “Factors Impact to Total Tax Collection in Southeast Asia Countries”. Advances in Mechanics, 9(3): 1895-1904.‏
Mai, H. L. T., & Van, H. T. (2021). “Factors Impact to Total Tax Collection in Southeast Asia Countries”. Advances in Mechanics, 9(3): 1895-1904.
Makian, N., Tavaklian, H., & Najafi Fara Shah, M. S. (2018). “Investigating the effect of direct taxes shock on GDP and inflation in Iran within the framework of a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model”. Financial Economics, 13(49): 1-46(in persion).
Matikka, T. (2015). “The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence from Changes in Regional Income Tax Rates in Finland”. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(3): 943-973.‏
Matikka, T. (2015). “The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence from Changes in Regional Income Tax Rates in Finland”. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(3): 943-973.
Mousavi, M. R., & Nowrozi, H. (2010). “Empirical estimation of inflation tax and Laffer curve levels: a case study of Iran's economy”, Economic Research Journal, 11(42): 39-64(in persion).
Nutahara, K. (2015). “Laffer curves in Japan”. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 36(3): 56-72.‏
Poterba, J. M. (2011). “Introduction: Economic analysis of tax expenditures”. National Tax Journal, 64(2): 451-457.
Pour Moghim, S.J., Nematpour, M., & Mousavi, M. H. (2004). “Investigating the effective factors on the level of tax revenue collection in Iran's tax system”, Economic Research Journal, 5(17): 161-187(in persion).
Pourmoqim, S J., Nakhai, M., & Raushi, Z. (2013). “Review and test of the Laffer curve in Iran's tax system”. Master's thesis, Al-Zahra University(in persion).
Sanz-Sanz, J. F. (2022). “A full-fledged analytical model for the Laffer curve in personal income taxation”. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73(1): 795-811.‏
Shahmoradi, A. (2008) “Surveying on the Effect of Energy Price Changes on Price Level, Production and Welfare”, Iran Ministry of Economic Affairs And Finance, 21(8): 1-29.
Shahmoradi, A., Haghighi, I., & Zahedi, R. (2009). “Analysis of the impact of price policies in economic sectors, focusing on water and energy”, Ministry of Energy, Deputy Planning and Economic Affairs(in persion).
Simons, H. (1938), “Personal Income Taxation: The Definition of Income as a Problem of Fiscal Policy”, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 283.