پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

تحلیل رابطۀ پیشرفت اجتماعی و رشد اقتصادی مبتنی بر الگوی معادلات هم‌زمان داده‌های تابلویی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
چکیده
در این مقاله به منظور بررسی اثرات متقابل شاخص پیشرفت اجتماعی و رشد اقتصادی از آمارهای مربوط به پیشرفت اجتماعی و تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه در 27 کشور عضو گروه سازمان همکاری اسلامی که به ترتیب برگرفته از شاخص پیشرفت اجتماعی و بانک جهانی در سال‌های 2012 تا 2021 می‌باشد استفاده شده و جهت بررسی ارتباط بین آن‌ها از رویکرد سیستم معادلات هم‌زمان در قالب روش حداقل مربعات سه مرحله‌ای (3SLS) استفاده شده است.

نتایج برآورد داده‌ها در سال‌های مورد بررسی نشان داد که در الگوی تولید ناخالص داخلی، شاخص پیشرفت اجتماعی، آزادی اقتصادی و مخارج مصرفی دولت تأثیر افزایشی و معنا‌داری بر تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه کشورهای مورد مطالعه دارد. در الگوی مربوط به شاخص پیشرفت اجتماعی نیز، شاخص جهانی نوآوری، شاخص آموزش و تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر شاخص پیشرفت اجتماعی دارد.

نتایج به‌دست آمده از هر دو الگو نشان از وجود رابطۀ مثبت و معنادار بین شاخص پیشرفت اجتماعی و تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه دارد که تأییدکنندۀ وجود رابطۀ مکملی بین این دو متغیر می‌باشد
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Social Progress and Economic Growth based on Simultaneous Equations of Panel Data

نویسندگان English

Seyed Ehsan Hosseinidoust 1
Akbar Khodabakhshi 1
Saeedeh Ahmadi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Ph.D. Student of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده English

Aim and Introduction

Achieving a high GDP requires an answer to the question of the factors that determine GDP. Social progress is one of the important and influential factors on the GDP. The Social Development Index is a scale for measuring social well-being, which is a completely new way of looking at well-being among countries in the world without referring to GDP. On the other hand, considering the fact that economic and social indicators must be improved as preconditions for increased living standards, which would be only possible in the shadow of economic growth, assumes it as a critical component contributing into improvement of social indicators. In this study, the mutual relationship between social progress index and GDP per capita for selected member countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, during the period of 2012-2021 is investigated. The countries studied in this research are: Albania, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Benin, Cameroon, Egypt, Guinea, Indonesia, Iran, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Tunisia, Turkey and UAE. Since the member countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation are developing countries, due to problems such as lack of human skills, inefficiency in production, lack of technological development, as well as the lack of expertise needed to produce and export competitive goods, have not been able to make significant progress in economic growth and development. Therefore, it seems that in these countries, development can be realized with social progress by paying attention to the issue of education and the basic needs of human resources in order to form and develop human capital. Investing more in human power has increased the level of productivity of production factors and technological development, and in this way, it is able to provide the necessary ground for the development of international trade and to achieve higher economic growth.

Methodology

In this research, the statistics related to social progress and GDP per capita in 27 member countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which are respectively taken from the social progress index and the World Bank in the years 2012 to 2021, have been used. In order to investigate the relationship between social progress and GDP, the simultaneous equation system approach in the form of the three-stage least square method (3SLS) has been applied` using Stata software. In the application of the system of simultaneous equations, it is necessary to have two recognizability conditions, which include the degree and rank condition. For this purpose, before estimating the model, these conditions have been examined first, and then preliminary tests of the model specification, such as the cross-sectional correlation test in the disturbance component, the unit root test of the combined data, the cointegration and endogeneity test have been performed.

Findings

The results of the data estimation over the period showed that in the model of GDP, social progress index, economic freedom and government consumption expenditure have an increasing and significant effect on the GDP per capita of the studied countries. The trade openness variable also has a negative and non-significant effect on GDP per capita. In the model related to the social progress index, the global innovation index, education index and GDP per capita have a positive and significant effect on the social progress index. The urban population variable also has a negative and insignificant effect on the social progress index.

Discussion and Conclusion

The results of the model estimation show that the social progress index variable in the per capita GDP model has the greatest impact on the per capita GDP among other influencing variables. The contribution of social progress into the performance of the economy and development process can be considered through reducing inequality and poverty, increasing market efficiency, economic growth, reducing costs, increasing the efficiency of human resources and capital, creating economic institutions and organizations and improving their performance, and increasing investment and employment, as well as increasing innovation and technology. The results of the estimation of the social progress index model also show the presence of a positive and significant effect of GDP per capita on the social progress index. In other words, with the increase of GDP per capita, many basic human needs such as nutrition and health care, water, health, shelter and personal safety, which is one of the indicators of social progress, are improved. In addition, in the mentioned model, the education index among other influential variables has more weight in influencing the social progress index. In other words, manpower training improves welfare infrastructure as well as opportunities, which are two dimensions of the social progress index. Finally, according to the results obtained from both models, which confirm the existence of a positive and significant relationship between the social progress index and GDP per capita, it can be concluded that there is a complementary relationship between these two variables

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Social Progress Index
GDP per Capita
Endogeneity
System of Simultaneous Equations
Three-stage Least Squares Method (3SLS)
Aghaei, M; Reza Qolizadeh, M; Bagheri, F; (2013), Investigating the impact of human capital on economic growth in the provinces of Iran, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education,67(19), 21-44.(In Persian)
Aigner, D., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, P.(1977), Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models, Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
Alonso Martinez, D., (2018), Social Progress and international Patent Collaboration, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Asandului, L., Lacobuta, A., Cautisanu, C. (2016), Modelling Economic Growth Based on Economic Freedom and Social Progress, European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(3), 229-238.
Azizi, Z; (2016), Investigating the effect of trade on development: evaluation and comparison of indicators of per capita income, human development and human progress, Planning and Budgeting Quarterly, 3(21), 119-142. (In Persian)
Barro, R. (1999), Human Capital and Growth in Cross-Country Regression. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 6(2), 237-277.
Carlson, F., Lundstrom, S.,(2002), Economic Freedom an Growth: Decompsing the Effects. Department of Economics, Goteborg University, Working Paper in Economics, 112(3-4), 335-344.
Carvalho, I.C.S.D., Serio, L.C.D., Guimaraes, C.M.C., Furlanetto. K.S., (2020), The Social Progress on The Development of Global Competitiveness, International Business Journal.
Cheraghi, B; Torabi, T; Mohammadi, T; Taqvi, M; (2019), Investigating the factors of non-realization of sustainable economic growth from the perspective of social capital in Iran's economy, Economic Growth and Development Research Quarterly, 34 (9). (In Persian)
Dargahi, H; Qadiri, A; (2003), Analysis of the determinants of Iran's economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Business Research, 26(7), 1-33.(In Persian)
Ershad, H.M., Haque, M., (2016), Impact of Economic Freedom on the Growth Rate: A Panel Data Analysis, Economics, 4(2), 1-15.
Faisal Sultan Qadri, f., Abdul Waheed, W. (2011), Human Capital and Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Business Review, (1), 815-833.
Gujarati, D; (2010), Basics of Econometrics, Translation Abrishami, Hamid; Tehran University Publications.(In Persian)
Hall, J. C., Lawson, R.A. (2014), Economic Freedom of the World: An Accounting of the Literature Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1), 1-19
Karimova, Sh., (2020), The Global Social Progress Frontier, Masters Thesis, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences.
Karimi, M.S; Dourbash, M; Heydarian, M; (2017), Investigating the role and effects of good governance in Iran's economic growth, the first international conference on economic planning, sustainable and balanced regional development, approaches and applications, University of Kurdistan.(In Persian)
Khodaparast Mashhadi, M; Falahi, M.A; Ariana, A; (2014), Investigating the effect of social capital and economic freedom on Iran's economic growth, Research Journal of Macroeconomics, 17(5),75-98.(In Persian)
King, R., Rebelo, S., (1990), Public Policy and Economic Growth, Journal of Political Economy.
Kormendi, R., Meguire, P., (1985), Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth, Journal of Monetery Economjcs, 63-141.
Landau, D., (1985), Government and Economic Growth in the Less Development Countries, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 35-45.
Latifi, Gh; Qaempour M.A; (2016), the effect of special economic zones on the welfare and social development of urban and rural areas (case study: Salafchegan Special Economic Zone), Welfare and Social Development Planning Quarterly, 27(7), 189-224. (In Persian)
Lucas, R.E. (1988), On The Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economic, (22), 3-42.
Meeusen, W., Broeck, J.V.D. (1977), Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error, International Economic Review, 18(2), 435-444.
Mehrgan, N; Ashrafzadeh, S.H.R; (2008), Panel Data Econometrics, University of Tehran, Cooperative Research Institute.(In Persian)
Mohamed, E., (2020), Economic, Social, and Environmental Dimensions of Development in sudan. Economic- Financial Development and Cultural Transformation.
Motaghi, S; (2017), Investigating the role of social development on economic growth (case study: Iran and Turkey), Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, 3(9), 57-68.(In Persian)
Nadeem, S., Qaisar, B., Usman Siddiqi, M., (2018), Relationship of Social Progress Index (SPI) with Gross Domestic Product (GDP PPP Per Capita): The Moderating Role of Corruption Perception Index (CPI), Pakistan Journal of Engineering Technology and Science (PJETS), 7(1), 61-76.
Namazi, M; Kermani, E; (2008), the effect of ownership structure on the performance of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Accounting and Auditing Quarterly, 53(15), 83-100.(In Persian)
Pitt, M.M., Lee, L.F., (1981). The Measurement and Sources of technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry, Journal of Development Economics, 9(1), 43-64.
Porter, M.E., Stern, S., Green, M, (2015), Social Progress Index, Social Progress Imperative.
Razmi, A.A; Razmi, S. M. J; Shahraki, S; (2009), The effect of economic freedom on economic growth with the institutionalist school approach: a causal investigation, Knowledge and Development Journal (Scientific-Research), 28(16), 127-157.(In Persian)
Rezai Roshan, H; Rahmani Firouzjah, A; Tehranchian, A.M; Mohseni, R.A; (2019), The effect of social progress and economic freedom on GDP using panel data method, Social Welfare Quarterly, 75(19), 9-54.(In Persian)
Romer, D. (2004), Advanced Macroeconomics, Translated by Taghavi, M., Science and Research Branch of Islamic Azad University.
Safdari, M; Karim, M.H; Khosravi, M.R; (2008), Investigating the impact of social capital on Iran's economic growth, Quantitative economics Quarterly (Former Economic Reviews), 2(5), 39-61.(In Persian)
Salahodjaev, R., Otajonov, Sh., (2021), The Role of Innovation in Social Progress? An Empirical Exploration, ICFNDS 2021, Dubai.
Shabani Farani, e; Derakhshan, M; (2020), Development Book: A Consolidated Review of Iran's Position in Global Development Indexes, Development Intellectual Survey, Development Observatory Unit.(In Persian)
Shahabadi, A; Bahri, z; (2013), The effect of political stability and economic freedom on the economic growth of selected developed and developing countries, Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 16(4),53-72.(In Persian)
Souri, A; (2012), econometrics with the use of Eviews7, Tehran, Cultural Publishing House and Noor elm Publishing House.(In Persian)
Tazri; Youssef Beigi, Alamdar, A.K; Nourollahi; Rostami; (2015), Social Progress Index in 2014, Ministry of Labor Cooperation and Social Welfare, Department of Social Welfare, Bureau of Social Welfare Studies, Report No 3, Sadat Publishing.(In Persian)