پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

بررسی تأثیر لایه‌ های نظام تأمین اجتماعی بر عدالت اقتصادی - اسلامی با تأکید بر تکافل

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تبریز، تبریز، ایران
3 استاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و بازرگانی، دانشگاه تبریز،تبریز، ایران.
4 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تبریز، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
با توجه به اهمیت عدالت اقتصادی از دیدگاه اسلام از یک‌سو و نقش تعیین ‏کننده نظام تأمین اجتماعی در عدالت از سوی دیگر، همچنین براساس این واقعیت که بیمه تکافل به‌عنوان یک الگوی اسلامی پرکاربرد در پوشش ریسک بیمه که تفاوت‏هایی اساسی همچون مشارکتی بودن، عدم تمرکز بر سود، و تطابق با مقررات شریعت با بیمه‏ های مرسوم دارد، مورد توجه اندیشمندان حوزه مالی و نیز فعالان بازارهای مالی، به‌خصوص بازار محصولات بیمه‏ ای درکشورهای مختلف اسلامی جهان است، هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی تأثیر انواع لایه ‏های نظام تأمین اجتماعی بر عدالت اقتصادی اسلامی در استان‏های ایران در دورۀ زمانی 1387-1400 با به‌کارگیری روش GMM و نیز پیش‏بینی تأثیر تکافل بر ارتقای عدالت از طریق هدایت هزینه‏ های مذهبی خانوارها به سمت بیمه تکافل بوده است. نتایج این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که نابرابری دوره قبل و تولید ناخالص داخلی رابطه مثبت و نرخ تورم رابطه منفی با نابرابری دارند. علاوه بر این، هر سه لایه مساعدت‏های اجتماعی، بیمه‏ های اجتماعی پایه و بیمه ‏های اجتماعی تکمیلی به‌طور معنی‏ داری باعث کاهش نابرابری می‏ گردد. در این میان، بیمه ‏های اجتماعی پایه بیشترین تأثیر و مساعدت‏های اجتماعی کمترین تأثیر را بر کاهش نابرابری دارند. علاوه بر این، براساس نتایج حاصله، می‏ توان بیان نمود که از طریق هدایت مخارج مذهبی خانوارها به سوی بیمه تکافل که بیمه‌ای اسلامی و از نوع بیمه اجتماعی پایه می‏‏ باشد، می‏توان نابرابری اقتصادی اسلامی را در سال‏های 1402 و 1403 به‌ترتیب به میزان حداقل0.31 و 0.25 (چهار محال و بختیاری) و حداکثر 5.95 و 5.91 (مرکزی) کاهش داد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Social Security System Layers and Islamic Economic Justice with Special Emphasis on Takaful

نویسندگان English

Hamidreza Naeb Khosroshahi 1
Mohammadreza Nahidi Amirkhiz 2
Mohammadali Motafakker Azad 3
Seyyed Ali Paytakhti Oskooe 4
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 Professor of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
4 Associate Professor of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction

Economic development is one of the main goals of all countries, and most scientists believe that development is only accessible if there is equality. For this reason, despite the differences and contradictions in schools and societies, the issue of inequality and especially economic inequality has been always a vital concern of economists and policymakers all over the world. Meanwhile, since justice is one of the fundamental goals of Islam, Islamic economists have a more scrutinizing and much clear vision of equality. Apart from the importance of economic equality in Islam, it has a cucial role in social security systems and equality concepts as well. Takaful insurance, is a widely used Islamic model in insurance risk coverage which has fundamental differences with conventional insurance mechanisms. Takaful is cooperative, not profit oriented, and fully allined and complied with Islamic rules and regulations. This study is aiming at investigating the effect of various layers of social security system on Islamic-economic equality in the Iranian provinces during 2008-2021. GMM prediction model is applied for predicting the effect of Takaful on inequality and directing houshold religious expenses towards Takaful insurance.

Methodology

According to previous theoretical and experimental literature, economic inequality can be affected by inequality in previous years. Therefore, in this study a dynamic econometric method is used to include the lagged dependant variable as one of the explanatory variables. In general, if a variable depends on vaiables of previous periods, among other independent ones, it is better to use a dynamic panel data model. Generalized method of moments is one of the common and widely used dynamic approaches. The reason for the popularity of this method is that it is very flexible and requires only some weak assumptions. Therefore, Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) greatly solves the problems of static panel data methods related to autocorrelation, variance heterogeneity, and skewness. The reason for using this method is that, firstly, there is a possibility that the current dependent variable is affected by the lagged variables, and secondly, since one of the ways to control the endogeneity of variables is to use instrumental variable and due to the fact that it is very difficult to find such an instrument, it is possible to use lagged variables as appropriate instruments applying GMM estimator.

Findings

The results of this research indicate that the inequality of the previous period has a positive and significant relationship with current economic inequality in all three models. This means that high inequality in the previous period causes high inequality in the current period. Moreover, consistent with some studies, GDP has a positive and significant relationship with economic inequality. It means that an increase in GDP is associated with increased inequality. This result indicates that in Iran, there is no antipoverty growth. Inflation rate has also a negative relationship with inequality in all models, and this relationship is significant in two models. Following some previous studies, this result can be interpreted as the negative relationship can be caused by the fact that the inflation of luxury goods is higher than the inflation of essential goods and therefore, increased inflation is more detrimental to the rich. In addition, all three layers of social assistance, basic social insurance, and supplementary social insurance significantly reduce inequality. Meanwhile, basic social insurance has the greatest effect, and social assistance has the least effect on reducing inequality. In addition, based on the results, it can be stated that by directing houshold religious expenses towards Takaful insurance, which is an Islamic insurance and a type of basic social insurance, it is possible to reduce Islamic-Economic inequality in 2023 and 2024. The amounts of the decreases are predicted to be a minimum of 0.31 and 0.25 (Chahar Mahal and Bakhtiari) and a maximum of 5.95 and 5.91 (Markazi).

Discussion and Conclusion

According to the results, investing in all three layers of social security can lead to a reduction in inequality. Therefore, it is suggested not to ignore any layer in policymaking. Due to the greater impact of basic insurance on equality, it is thought to consider it as the basic layer of social security and focus on this layer to reduce inequality more. Managers and policymakers can also focus on Takaful as one of the basic types of insurance and help to provide Islamic-Economic equality by directing houshold religious expenses towards Takaful. Moreover, it is suggested that the governmental plans should be based on combining economic growth with improved welfare and income distribution which is one of the main goals of the Islamic economy. It is also suggested that the religious and cultural officials should create the necessary explanation and enlightenment related to Takaful and social responsibility of people. The government responsiblity in creating a foundation and guiding people to fulfill their social responsibility by strengthening and developing Zakat headquarters and communicating with social security organization should not be underestimated.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Economic Inequality
Generalized Method of Moments
Iran Economy
Social Security
Takaful
The Quran
Abou Nouri, E (1997). The Effect of Macroeconomic Indicators on Income Distribution in Iran. Economic Research, Vol. 51, pp. 1-31. (In Persian)
Ahmadi, A. M., and Mehregan, N. (2005). Variations of Income Distribution and The Economic Adjustment in Iranian Economy. Economic Research, Vol. 70, pp. 209-232. (In Persian)
Aminrashti, N., and Ghorbani Valikchali, A. (2013). The Social Security System of the Human Development in Iran. Financial Economics, Vol. 7, Issue, 23, pp. 81-110. (In Persian)
Amornthum, S. (2004). Income Inequality, Inflation and Nonlinearity: The Case of Asian Economies. University of Hawaii, Economic Research Organization Lecture note, No. 601.
Arellani, M., and Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 58 (2), pp. 277-297.
Arena, M. (2008). Does Insurance Market Activity Promote Economic Growth? A Cross-Country Study for Industrialized and Developing Countries. Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 921-946.
Asongu, S. A., and Odhiambo, N. M. (2020). Insurance and Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Policy Thresholds. African Governance and Development Institute, Forthcoming: International Social Science Journal, WP/20/005.
Bonfiglioli, A., 2012. Investor protection and income inequality: Risk sharing vs risk taking. Journal of Development Economics, 99: 92-104.
Brzezinski, M. and Salach, K. (2022). Determinants of inequality in transition countries. IZA World of Labor, 496. doi: 10.15185/izawol.496.
Bucevska, V (2019) Determinants of Income Inequality in EU Candidate Countries: A Panel Analysis. Economic Themes, Vol. 57 (4), pp/ 397-413.
Checchi, D. and C. García-Peñalosa, 2004. Risk and the distribution of human capital. Economic Letter, 82: 53–61.
Derakhshan, M. (2008). Econometrics, Volume 1: Single Equations with Classical Assumptions (Part 1). Publisher: SAMT, Third Print. (In Persian)
Galli, R. and Van der Hoeven, R. (2001). Is Inflation Bad for Income Inequality: The Importance of the Initial Rate of Inflation; Employment Paper (29).
Ghaffari, A. A., Asgari, A., and Abedian, S. H. (2019). Place of Justice in Cultural-Social Development with Emphasis on Positive Law. Socio-Cultural Development Studies, Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 195-214. (In Persian)
Ghasemi Dehaghi, M., Karimi Moughari, Z., and Elmi, Z. (2023). The Impact of Economic-Political Factors on Inequality in the First (1989-1993) and Second (1995-1999) Development Plans. Economic Research and Policies, Vol. 31 (106), pp. 287-312. (In Persian)
Ghoreishi, F., and Mohammadi, M. H. (2022). Factors Influencing and Reproducing Income Inequality: A Case Study of India. Polotics Quarterly, Vol. 52, Issue 2, pp. 483-503. (In Persian)
Hamzehpour, M., Mohammadi, R., and Sherafati, M. (2013). Convergence of Governing Institutions in Line with Social Takaful with Islamic Approach. The International Congress on Islamic Humanities, Specialized Islamic Management Commission. (In Persian)
Jamshidi, N., and Toghyani Dolatabadi, M. (2019). Advantage of Takaful on Insurance from the Perspective of Economic Justice. Islamic Economics and Banking, Vol. 8, Issue 26, pp. 25-50. (In Persian)
Kaestner, R., and Lubotsky, D. (2016). Health Insurance and Income Inequality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 53–78.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, Vol. 45, pp. 1–28.
Mbazia, N. (2017). Inequality and Growth in Tunesia: Empirical Evidence on the Role of Macroeconomic Factors. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, vol. 8 (16), pp. 153-160.
Mirzayi, A., Hasani, M., Nouraldini, S. S. (2014). The Effect of Important Insurance Indicators on Economic Growth in OPEC Member Countries Using a Dynamic Panel Model Using GMM Method. Journal of Insurance Research, Vol. 29 (1), pp. 1-22. (In Persian)
Mirzayi, A., and Mirzayi, Z. (2015). The Nature of the Right to Social Security in Islam. Islamic Human Rights Studies, Vol. 8, pp. 95-116. (In Persian)
Motameni, M. (2015). Private Insurance and Income Inequality in Iran. Asian Economic and Financial Review, Vol. 5 (3), pp. 418-425.
Mousavi Jahromi, Y., Khodadad Kashi, F., and Ahmadi, A. M. (2014). Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Income Inequality. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, Vol. 61, pp. 117-147. (In Persian)
Naghdi, A., Mehregan, M., and Mali Amiri, M. (2021). The Role of Insurance in Reducing Social Inequality. Insurance Research Center, Vol. 87. (In Persian)
Niyimbanira, F. (2017). Analysis of the Impact of Economic Growth on Income Inequality and Poverty in South Africa: The case of Mpumalanga Province. International Journal of Economic and Financial Issues, vol. 7 (4), pp. 254-261.
Panahi, H., and Nasibparast, S. (2015). Factors Affecting Income Distribution in Iran’s Provinceswith an Emphasis on Qarz al-Hasaneh: A Bayesian Econometric Approach. Ma’rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami. Vol. 2. Issue 12, pp. 23-42. (In Persian)
Pham-Dao, L. (2016). Public Insurance and Wealth Inequality - A Euro Area Analysis. Demographischer Wandel - Session: Inequality in Germany and Europe, No. A06-V3, ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Kiel und Hamburg.
Rasouli, H., Abbaschian, A., Hamidi, G., and Khalji, S. (2019). An overview of the basics of takaful insurance. Economic Journal, Vol. 19 (3-4), pp. 125-153. (In Persian)
Romer, C. D., and Romer, D. H. (1998). Monetary Policy and the Well-Being of the Poor. NBER Working Paper 6793, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Rubin, A., and Segal, D. (2015). The Effect of Economic Growth on Income Inequalityin the US. Journal of Macoeconomics, vol. 45 (1), pp. 258-273.
Sadri H. (2012). Economic Justice Criteria: The Just and Efficient Extraction and Usage of Exhaustible Resources. Islamic Economics and Banking, Vol. 1 (1), pp. 129-145. (In Persian)
Shakeri, A., Jahangard, E., and Aghlami, S. (2013). The Nonlinear Effect of Inflation on Income Inequality in Iran. The Economic Research, Vol. 13 (4), pp. 27- 53. (In Persian)
Shakeri, A., Momeni, F., Khadem Alizadeh, A., and Makhzan Mousavi, S. H. (2019). Assessing the Synthesized Index of Economic Justice with an Islamic Approach in Iran (1995-2018). Journal of Iran’s Economic Essays: An Islamic Approach, Vol. 16, Issue 31, pp. 9-40. (In Persian)
Shakeri, A., Momeni, F., Khadem Alizadeh, A., and Makhzan Mousavi, S. H. (2019). An Introduction to Combined Index of Economic Justice: An Islamic Approach. Journal of Islamic Economics, Vol. 74 (19), pp. 5-33. (In Persian)
Shakeri Bostanabad, R., and Jalili, Z. (2020). Factors Affecting Provincial Income Distribution Inequality in Iran: Using a Fractional Panel Probit Model. The Economic Research (Sustainable Growth and Development), Vol. 20 (4), pp. 205-228. (In Persian)
Shao, L. F. (2021). Robust Determinants of Income Distribution Across and Within Countries. PLoS ONE 16(7): e0253291. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0253291.
Sharif al-Razi, M. (1414 Gh). Nahj al-Balagha. Translation: Ansariyan, H., Publisher: Payame Azadi, Second Print, Tehran. (In Persian)
Tehranchian, A. M., Zaroki, S., and Imani, N. (2019). An Empirical Test of the Impact of Insurance on Income Inequality in Iran. Planning and Budgeting, Vol. 24 (3), pp. 35-60. (In Persian)
Zhu, L., and Clark, J. H. (2015). Inequality in Health Care Persists at the State Level, Especially in Real State with Diverse Populations. USApp-American Politics and Policy Blog. vol. 15 (2), pp. 239-262.
Zobeiri, H., Motamani, M., and Osia, S. S. (2021). Insurance, Inequality and Sustainable Development; The Effect of Commercial Insurance on Income Inequality in Selected Developing and Developed Countries. Journal of Iranian Economic Development Analyses, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 1-16. (In Persian)