پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات بر رد پای اکولوژیکی در کشورهای صادرکنندۀ نفت

نویسندگان
فاطمه آریان فر 1
زهرا (میلا) علمی 2
1 کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد انرژی،دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری، دانشگاه مازندران، ایران.
2 استاد گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
10.22034/24.2.27
چکیده
رشد چشمگیر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات(ICT) جنبه ‏های مختلف زندگی ازجمله محیط ‏زیست را تحت تأثیر قرار داده است. با توجه به اهمیت کیفیت محیط ‏زیست و درهم ‏آمیختگی زندگی بشر با فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات (ICT)، این مطالعه به بررسی تأثیر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات، شاخص پیچیدگی اقتصادی، تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه، توسعۀ مالی، صادرات و رشد جمعیت بر رد پای اکولوژیکی سرانه (EF) به‌عنوان شاخصی جامع ‏تر برای کیفیت محیط ‏زیست نسبت به co2 در کشورهای منتخب صادرکنندۀ نفت طی دورۀ 2006-2020 می ‏پردازد. نتایج برآورد با روش گشتاورهای تعمیم‏ یافته نشانگر وجود رابطه U معکوس بین فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات و رد پای اکولوژیکی سرانه است. همچنین، نتایج حاکی از رابطۀ مثبت و معنی‏ دار بین تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه، توسعۀ مالی و رشد جمعیت با رد پای اکولوژیکی است. طبق بررسی شاخص پیچیدگی اقتصادی و صادرات کالاها و خدمات با رد پای اکولوژیکی رابطۀ منفی و معنی دار داشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها
فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات(ICT)
رد پای اکولوژیکی سرانه
تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه
شاخص پیچیدگی اقتصادی
روش گشتاورهای تعمیم‌یافته

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

ICT and Ecological Footprint in Oil-exporting Countries

نویسندگان English

fatemeh arianfar 1
Zahra (Mila) Elmi 2
1 Master of energy Economics, Faculty of economic and administrative sciences, University of Mazandaran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of economic and administrative sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction:

Economic stability via Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has sparked interesting discussions among scholars. ICT plays a crucial role in realizing sustainable development objectives. Globally, the prospective advantages of ICT are widely acknowledged. Some research has solely emphasized ICT's role in mitigating air pollution, but the ecological implications of ICT have largely been overlooked. This article is pioneering in domestic studies of ICT's influence on ecological footprint. In addition, the present research uniquely computes the ICT index through the principal component method, distinguishing it from other ICT studies conducted within Iran. In recent times, the ecological footprint has been embraced as a broader gauge for assessing environmental damage. One reason for this choice is that other environmental harm indicators, such as air and water pollution, deforestation, and others, only represent a part of the total environmental degradation. However, the ecological footprint index incorporates diverse elements like agricultural lands, pastures, fishing areas, forests, carbon footprint, and constructed lands, hence offering a more holistic measure. Concerning the topic in question, it is evident from national studies that there has been little research on identifying the factors contributing to the ecological footprint.

Methodology:

In this research, we investigate the impact of the information and communication technology (ICT) index on selected oil-exporting countries' ecological footprint from 2006 to 2020. To do this, we use the generalized moments method. We extracted the model of this research from the studies of Higon et al. (2017) and Caglar et al. (2021) for carbon dioxide emissions. The variables of our study include the ecological footprint (as the dependent variable), the information and communication technology index (an explanatory variable calculated using the principal component analysis (PCA) method), and control variables such as GDP per capita, exports of goods and services, financial development, and economic Complexity Index which is chosen on the review of other studies. The data used for this study are taken from databases such as the World Bank and the Global Resource Footprint Network and the Atlas of Economic Complexity.

Discussion and Conclusion:

Given the challenges posed by global warming to current and future generations, this study aims to explore the impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on the ecological footprint in chosen oil-exporting nations. This study studied the inverse U relationship of the information and communication technology index with the emission of ecological footprints from 2006 to 2020. The ecological footprint is an index of the amount of environmental pollution and a more comprehensive index than CO2. A data description was undertaken before estimating the model. The research model, built on theoretical underpinnings and past studies, was structured, and estimated by the Generalized Moments Method.

The findings showed a non-linear connection between ICT and the ecological footprint in oil-exporting countries. ICT augments the ecological footprint per capita before a certain threshold, but it begins to diminish after that.

The positive and significant coefficient of GDP per capita indicates the increase in ecological footprint per capita for the increase of GDP per capita. This result indicates that economic activities such as industrialization and development cause the exploitation of natural resources, which causes more pollution.

Financial development has had a positive and significant effect on the ecological footprint. To prevent the destructive effect of financial development on the environment, governments in selected oil-exporting countries should develop financial markets in such a way that financial resources are available for investing in projects that help introduce clean energy technologies.

The economic complexity index has had a negative and significant effect on the per capita ecological footprint. In fact, the expansion of economic complexity in the studied countries will lead to the reduction of the ecological footprint. According to the obtained result, the economic complexity index can be considered as one of the ecological footprint control factors; Therefore, the production of more complex goods that contain higher technology can lead to a reduction in energy consumption and ecological footprint; Therefore, governments can provide tax exemptions and subsidies for those companies that use new technology and clean energy, and also support knowledge-based products.

The influence of goods and services exports on the ecological footprint has been negative and substantial. The significance of the quality and diversity of exported goods regarding environmental destruction has not yet been thoroughly considered. Therefore, the focus should be on enhancing the quality of export goods via cleaner production methods. Overall energy consumption should also be reduced in all countries, with policymakers prioritizing the use of renewable energy resources and promoting the reduction of fossil-fuel energy export products.

The influence of urban population growth on the ecological footprint has been positive and substantial. Essentially, uncontrolled population growth, especially in developing countries, creates grave issues including scarcity of food, poor air and water quality, environmental contamination, degradation of the ecological structure, waste disposal problems, and high energy usage.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
Ecological Footprint Per Capita
GDP per Capita
Economic Complexity Index
Generalized Moments Method
Abid, N., Wu, J., Ahmad, F., Draz, M. U., Chandio, A. A., & Xu, H. (2020). Incorporating environmental pollution and human development in the energy-growth nexus: a novel long run investigation for Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5154.
Aghahosseini, A., Bogdanov, D., & Breyer, C. (2020). Towards sustainable development in the MENA region: Analysing the feasibility of a 100% renewable electricity system in 2030. Energy Strategy Reviews, 28, 100466.
Ahmed, U., & ArshadKhan, M. (2009). Energy demand in Pakistan: A disaggregate analysis. The Pakistan Development Review, 47(4), 437-455.
Ahmed, Z., & Le, H. P. (2021). Linking Information Communication Technology, trade globalization index, and CO2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7), 8770-8781.
Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological indicators, 48, 315-323.
Amri, F., Zaied, Y. B., & Lahouel, B. B. (2019). ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 212-217.
Asongu, S. A. (2018). ICT, openness and CO 2 emissions in Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 9351-9359.
Atsu, F., Adams, S., & Adjei, J. (2021). ICT, energy consumption, financial development, and environmental degradation in South Africa. Heliyon, 7(7), e07328.
Avom, D., Nkengfack, H., Fotio, H. K., & Totouom, A. (2020). ICT and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effects and transmission channels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120028.
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Ibáñez-Luzón, L., Usman, M., & Shahbaz, M. (2022). The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries. Renewable Energy, 185, 1441-1455.
Bekaroo, G., Bokhoree, C., & Pattinson, C. (2016). Impacts of ICT on the natural ecosystem: A grassroot analysis for promoting socio-environmental sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1580-1595.
Bieser, J. C., & Hilty, L. M. (2018). Assessing indirect environmental effects of information and communication technology (ICT): A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10(8), 2662.
Bouznit, M., & Pablo-Romero, M. D. P. (2016). CO2 emission and economic growth in Algeria. Energy Policy, 96, 93-104.
Caglar, A. E., Mert, M., & Boluk, G. (2021). Testing the role of information and communication technologies and renewable energy consumption in ecological footprint quality: Evidence from world top 10 pollutant footprint countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126784.
Da Silva, J. M. C., Li, H., & Barbosa, L. C. F. (2020). The ecological intensity of human well-being at the local level. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8, 100061.
Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., & Dogan, E. (2018). Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: the role of ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 29387-29396.
Dizji, Munireh and Badri Badri Bookstore, Arash and Sokhnoor, Behnam, 2013, investigation of the use of information and communication technology on the quality of the environment, the first national conference on environmental protection and planning, Hamedan. (In Persian)
Dogan, E., Ulucak, R., Kocak, E., & Isik, C. (2020). The use of ecological footprint in estimating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Science of the Total Environment, 723, 138063.
Esfahani, Qabadi, Azarbaijani and Karim. (1401). Analysis of the relationship between economic growth, energy consumption and ecological footprint in a selection of developed and developing countries. Economic research (sustainable growth and development), 86(22), 203-232. (In Persian)
Etehad, Faezeh (2016). Examining the environmental hypothesis of Kuznets (EKC) in Iran using the ecological footprint index as an indicator of environmental quality. Master's thesis. Islamic Azad University, Shahriar branch. )In Persian)
Fallahi, F., Sojudi, S., & Mamipours, S. (2012). The Impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on the Environmental Quality in Iran. Iranian Energy Economics, 1(2), 149-171. (In Persian)
Fotros, M. H., (2006). Discussions on environmental economics (collection of articles), Hamedan, Bo Ali Sina University Press. (In Persian)
Gorus, M. S., & Aydin, M. (2019). The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emission in MENA countries: Causality analysis in the frequency domain. Energy, 168, 815-822.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement
Haldar, A., & Sethi, N. (2022). Environmental effects of Information and Communication Technology-Exploring the roles of renewable energy, innovation, trade and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111754.
Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., & Simoes, A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Mit Press.
Hidalgo, C. A. (2009). The dynamics of economic complexity and the product space over a 42 year period. CID Working Paper Series.
Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 106(26), 10570-10575.
Higón, D. A., Gholami, R., & Shirazi, F. (2017). ICT and environmental sustainability: A global perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 85-95.
Ikram, M., Xia, W., Fareed, Z., Shahzad, U., & Rafique, M. Z. (2021). Exploring the nexus between economic complexity, economic growth and ecological footprint: Contextual evidences from Japan. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 101460.
Jafariparvizkhanlou, K., Paytkhati Oskoei, S. A., & Azali, R. (2021). Investigating the Impact of ICT and Economic Growth on Environmental Pollution: Case Study of Persian Gulf Countries. The Journal of Economic Studies and Policies, 8(1), 111-138. (In Persian)
Jie, H., Khan, I., Alharthi, M., Zafar, M. W., & Saeed, A. (2023). Sustainable energy policy, socio-economic development, and ecological footprint: The economic significance of natural resources, population growth, and industrial development. Utilities Policy, 81, 101490.
Kahouli, B., Hamdi, B., Nafla, A., & Chabaane, N. (2022). Investigating the relationship between ICT, green energy, total factor productivity, and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Energy Strategy Reviews, 42, 100871.
Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas, J. A., Salehnia, N., & Osmani, F. (2023). The effect of economic complexity, fertility rate, and information and communication technology on ecological footprint in the emerging economies: A two-step stirpat model and panel quantile regression. Quality & Quantity, 57(1), 737-763.
Khan, N., Baloch, M. A., Saud, S., & Fatima, T. (2018). The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matters?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(23), 22850-22860.
Khan, M.A., Ozturk, I., 2020. Examining foreign direct investment and environmental pollution linkage in Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(7), 7244-7255.
Kim, S. (2022). The Effects of Information and Communication Technology, Economic Growth, Trade Openness, and Renewable Energy on CO2 Emissions in OECD Countries. Energies, 15(7), 2517.
Lee, J. W., & Brahmasrene, T. (2014). ICT, CO2 emissions and economic growth: evidence from a panel of ASEAN. Global Economic Review, 43(2), 93-109.
Li, J., Gong, Y., & Jiang, C. (2022). Spatio-temporal differentiation and policy optimization of ecological well-being in the Yellow River Delta high-efficiency eco-economic zone. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130717.
Mashayekhi, B., Hojhabr kiani, K., Khalili, F., & Asgari, F. (2021). The Effect of Information and Communication Technology and Foreign Direct Investment on Green Productivity in Iran. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 23(1), 253-266. (In Persian)
Mehmood, U., Agyekum, E. B., Kotb, H., Milyani, A. H., Azhari, A. A., Tariq, S., ... & Velkin, V. I. (2022). Exploring the Role of Communication Technologies, Governance, and Renewable Energy for Ecological Footprints in G11 Countries: Implications for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 14(19), 12555.
Molaei, M., & Basharat, E. (2015). Investigating Relationship between Gross Domestic Product and Ecological Footprint as an Environmental Degradation Index. Journal of Economic Research (Tahghighat- E- Eghtesadi), 50(4), 1017-1033. (In Persian)
Molaei, M., Besharat, E., & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Factors Affecting the Consumption of Ecological Resources in Iran Using Economic Approach. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(8), 377-388. (In Persian)
Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M., & Deumling, D. (2004). Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land use policy, 21(3), 231-246.
N’dri, L. M., Islam, M., & Kakinaka, M. (2021). ICT and environmental sustainability: any differences in developing countries? . Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126642.
Neagu, O., & Teodoru, M. C. (2019). The relationship between economic complexity, energy consumption structure and greenhouse gas emission: heterogeneous panel evidence from the EU countries. Sustainability, 11(2), 497.
Parvin shoar Gangachin, F., Hekmati Farid, S., Zonouzi, J. (2015). The Effect of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on environmental quality in MENA Countries. Master's thesis. Urmia University. (In Persian).
Parsasharif, H., AmirNejad, H., & Taslimi, M. (2021). Investigating and Determining the Factors Affecting the Ecological Footprint of Selected Asian and European Countries. Agricultural Economics Research, 13(2), 155-172. (In Persian)
Pouri, M. J., & Hilty, L. M. (2018). ICT-enabled sharing economy and environmental sustainability—a resource-oriented approach. In Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics (pp. 53-65). Springer, Cham.
Raheem, I. D., Tiwari, A. K., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2020). The role of ICT and financial development in CO2 emissions and economic growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(2), 1912-1922.
Rahman, M. M., Alam, K., & Velayutham, E. (2022). Reduction of CO2 emissions: The role of renewable energy, technological innovation and export quality. Energy Reports, 8, 2793-2805.
Saadi Poor, A., Damankeshideh, M., Shojayi, M. (2012). The analysis of impact of information and communication technology on CO2 emission; Across- country study. Master's thesis. Islamic Azad University. (In Persian).
Sepahvand, R., Sayehmiri, A., & Shirkhani, A. (2021). The Impact of Economic Complexity on Environmental Performance in the MENA Countries. The Economic Research, 21(3), 10-10.(In Persian)
Shabani, Z. D., & Shahnazi, R. (2019). Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: A panel causality analysis. Energy, 169, 1064-1078.
Sikder, M., Wang, C., Yao, X., Huai, X., Wu, L., KwameYeboah, F., ... & Dou, X. (2022). The integrated impact of GDP growth, industrialization, energy use, and urbanization on CO2 emissions in developing countries: Evidence from the panel ARDL approach. Science of The Total Environment, 155795.
Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Saha, T. (2020). Technology policy and environmental quality at crossroads: Designing SDG policies for select Asia Pacific countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120317.
Tamazian A, Chousa J, Vadlamannati K (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37:246–253.
Tarazkar, M. H., Ghorbanian, E., & Bakhshoodeh, M. (2018). The Effect of Economic Growth on Environmental Sustainability in Iran: Application of Ecological Footprint. Journal of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, 2(3), 51-70. (In Persian)
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our licological/ootprint: Reducing Human impact on the l'arih. Gabriola lsland, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Zakaria, M., & Bibi, S. (2019). Financial development and environment in South Asia: the role of institutional quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 7926-7937.
پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی
دوره 24، شماره 2
تابستان 1403
صفحه 27-58