پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

تحلیل اثر شاخص کارآفرینی بر اشتغال در استان‌های ایران: رهیافت اقتصادسنجی فضایی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد اقتصاد مالی اسلامی، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و بانکداری اسلامی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، دانشکدۀ اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکدۀ اقتصاد و مدیریت دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
چکیده
امروزه اهمیت ایجاد اشتغال در جهت ثبات اقتصادی جامعه موضوعی غیرقابل ‌انکار است. توجه هرچه بیشتر به موضوع اشتغال در جامعه می ‏تواند منجر به افزایش سطح رفاه عمومی و توسعۀ همه‌ جانبه در جامعه شود. یکی از عوامل مؤثر در ایجاد اشتغال و کاهش نرخ بیکاری، کارآفرینی است. کارآفرینی به‏طور گسترده به‏عنوان محرک اصلی رشد و توسعۀ اقتصادی در یک کشور شناخته می ‏شود که می ‏تواند اقتصاد و جامعه را به‏ طرق متعدد و پیچیده‏ ای تحت ‌تأثیر قرار دهد و سبب ایجاد فرصت ‏های شغلی جدید، کاهش بیکاری، ارتقای نوآوری، ایجاد تغییرات اجتماعی و بهبود رفاه مردم شود. بنابراین، ارزیابی اثرات شاخص کارآفرینی به‏ منظور ایجاد و گسترش بستر کارآفرینی به‏ ویژه برای استان ‏های کمتر توسعه ‏یافته و مرزی با نیل به افزایش میزان اشتغال بسیار با‌اهمیت است. از این ‏رو، هدف این پژوهش «تحلیل اثر شاخص‏ کارآفرینی بر اشتغال در استان ‌های ایران طی بازۀ زمانی 1392-1399 با رویکرد اقتصادسنجی فضایی» است. نتایج حاصل از این بررسی در چهارچوب داده‏های ترکیبی فضایی و براساس تخمین ‌زن دوربین فضایی نشان داد که شاخص کارآفرینی و اثرات مجاورت آن تأثیر مثبتی بر افزایش میزان اشتغال در استان ‏های ایران دارد. از سایر نتایج تحقیق، متغیر تولید ناخالص داخلی تأثیری مثبت و معنی ‏دار بر افزایش میزان اشتغال در استان ‏های فوق دارند، در حالی‏که متغیرهای شاخص قیمت و نرخ دستمزد تأثیری منفی بر میزان اشتغال استان ‏ها دارند. براساس نتایج تحقیق پیشنهاد می ‏شود جهت سرریز اثرات شاخص کارآفرینی به استان‏ های کشور، اتخاذ سیاست ‏های ایجاد صنایع کوچک و متوسط در مناطق روستایی و شهر های کوچک، ایجاد جلسات استانی بین کارآفرینان برتر جهت مشاوره، انتقال تجربیات، آگاهی از مشکلات موجود در این حوزه، آشنایی با مزیت ‏های نسبی مناطق مختلف کشور و بهبود زیرساخت‌های مختلف در مناطق محروم از طریق دولت جهت جذب هرچه بیشتر کارآفرینان انجام ‏شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analysis of the effect of entrepreneurship index on employment in Iranian provinces: Spatial econometric approach

نویسندگان English

zahra sepidbar 1
Yousef Mohammadzadeh 2
Vahid Nikpey pesyan 3
1 M.A. of Islamic Financial Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Islamic Banking, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University
3 Ph.D. student of Economic Development, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University
چکیده English

Introduction

In recent decades, achieving sustainable employment has become one of the main goals of economic policies. As a result, a large amount of research has been carried out in order to determine the most influential variables on the increase of employment in order to make a suitable economic policy. In this research, variables such as human capital (Kapelras et al., 2019), government spending (Doi et al., 2018), income distribution (Neos et al., 2016) and institutions (Galindo Martin et al., 2021 and Urbano et al., 2019)) have been effective factors in increasing the level of employment. However, important factors can potentially provide a significant portion of new jobs. Therefore, entrepreneurship can be another effective factor in increasing the employment rate.

Over the years, entrepreneurship has been proposed not only as a policy and strategy priority for economic growth (Adertesh, 2018 and Pepra and Adekoya, 2020), but also as an engine for creating employment and poverty alleviation (Desai and Hessels, 2008, Adosi, 2016 and Folster, 2000). In other words, the existing literature has proven that entrepreneurship ensures the welfare, productivity and efficiency of the economy (Bamol, 1990) and acts as a main driving force for promoting innovation, achieving new business ideas and changing economic structures(Adretsch et al., 2002; Fritsch, 2008 and Gomes et al., 2022). Furthermore, entrepreneurial activities in an economy have been proven to contribute to resilient economic performance by introducing innovations, implementing change, promoting and improving competitiveness (Wang et al., 2005). The organizational policy of the European Union also confirms the importance of entrepreneurship as a core competency for employment, growth and personal fulfillment (EC, 2004).

Methodology

In spatial econometrics, spatial effects are added to the performance of periodic or complex regression models (panels). Therefore, in spatial econometrics, sample information has a spatial component. When data has a spatial component, two issues can be raised: (1) Spatial dependence, and (2) Spatial heterogeneity. Before estimating spatial panel models, we need to perform spatial dependence tests and to check the existence of autocorrelation between disturbance terms. The existence of spatial coherence between observations and spatial autocorrelation between disturbance terms indicates the need to use spatial panel models. To do this, Moran, Jerry C, and Jetis Ord J tests are used. The Moran test examines the assumption of spatial autocorrelation between disturbance terms. In spatial econometric models, to model spatial reactions, it is necessary to select the numerical value of spatial directions. For this purpose, we have two sources of assumptions: (1) Position on the coordinate plane, which is expressed by latitude and longitude, so that the distance of any point in the location, or distance of any observation located at any point relative to fixed or central points or observations can be calculated. (2) The source of spatial information is neighborhood, and which expresses the relative location in the space of an observed peripheral unit, compared to other such scales.

Findings

The aim of the current research was to analyze the effect of entrepreneurship on employment in the provinces of Iran during 2013-2020 with a spatial econometric approach. First, in order to check the diagnosis of spatial dependence, the spatial dependence of the provinces was confirmed by Moran's test and based on the significance of the above test and according to the statistical coefficient of the Lagrange test, the research was evaluated in the framework of the spatial Durbin model. According to the results of the research, the entrepreneurship index has positive and significant effect on the employment rate of the target and neighboring provinces (overflow), and this result is coompatible with the findings of other researches, including Zu et al. 2022), Levin and Rubinstein (2018), Ataf and Al Balushi (2015), Miriam and Sandi (2015), Amini et al. (2013), Khoda Muradpour et al. (2018) and Khorsand et al. The research questions were confirmed. In addition, the variables of price index and wage rate have negative and significant effects on the employment rate of the target and neighboring provinces, while the gross domestic product has a positive and significant effect on the employment rate of the target provinces.

Discussion and Conclusion

Based on the results, the suggestions of the present research in order to increase the employment are as follows:


Financial support for provincial entrepreneurs through the removal of production barriers, the use of up-to-date global technologies in order to create competition with international entrepreneurs and reduce capital risk.
Presenting specialized trainings in the field of entrepreneurship with the approach of better understanding of investment opportunities, familiarity with different regions and provinces in terms of relative advantages.
Supporting small and medium enterprises in provincial development programs through incentives, tax exemptions, and government subsidies.
Stabilizing the price level in order to create a safe environment for encouraging entrepreneurs.
Adoption of policies to create small and medium industries in rural areas and small towns.
Establishing provincial meetings between top entrepreneurs for consultation, transfer of experiences, and awareness of existing problems in this field.
Improving various infrastructures in deprived areas to attract more entrepreneurs.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Entrepreneurship
Employment
spatial effects
provinces of Iran
Acs, Z. J., & Mueller, P. (2008). Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, gazelles and elephants, Small Business Economics, 30(1): 85-100.
Acs, Z., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). “Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions”. Small Business Economics, 31, 219–234.
Adejumo G (2001). Indigenous entrepreneurship development in Nigeria: characteristics, problems and prospects. Advances in Management: Journal of Department of Business Administration, University of Ilorin, Ilorin Nigeria, 2(1): 112-122.
Adusei, M. (2016). “Does entrepreneurship promote economic growth in Africa?” African Development Review, 28(2), 201–214.
Agili, F. A., Fariba Al-Sadat, Tayibi, Seyed Kamil, Zamani, & Ebrahimi. (2012). The effect of entrepreneurship and the development of small and medium enterprises on employment: the experience of several selected developing countries. Scientific Research Quarterly Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 5(2), 145-164. (in Farsi)
Akbari, Nematullah and Asgari, Ali (2012). "Methodology, Theory and Application of Spatial Econometrics", Research Journal of Isfahan University, Volume 12, Number 1 and 2, 1382, pp. 122-93. (in Farsi).
Amini, Alireza and Khosrovinejad, Ali Akbar and Pahlavan, Zohra (2014). Analyzing the role of entrepreneurship development on increasing employment: a case study of selected developing countries, Master's thesis, Faculty of Economics and Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, Summer 2014. (in Farsi)
Atef, T. M., & Al-Balushi, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship as a means for restructuring employment patterns. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 15(2), 73-90.
Audretsch, D. B. & Michael Fritsch (1994). “The Geography of Firm Births in Germany,” Regional Studies, 28(4), July, 359-365.
Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Audretsch, D. B. (2018). “Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and geography.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(4), 637–651.
Audretsch, D. B., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Wennekers, A. R. M. (2002). Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European–US comparison. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Badraq Nejad, Mohammadi Khayareh, Adabi Firouzjaei, & Baqer. (2022). Examining the relationship between entrepreneurship, economic growth and employment; Panel vector autoregression approach. Econometric Modeling, 7(1), 123-153. (in Farsi)
Baumol, William J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), pp. 893-921.
Binks, M. & Vale, P. (1990). Entrepreneurship and Economic Change. London: McGraw Hill.
Birch, D. (1987). Job Creation in America: How Our Smallest Companies Put the Most People to Work, Free Press, New York.
Capelleras, J. L., Contin-Pilart, I., Larraza-Kintana, M. & Martin-Sanchez, V. (2019), Entrepreneurs’ human capital and growth aspirations: The moderating role of regional entrepreneurial culture, Small Business Economics, 52(1): 3-25.
Caves, R. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mossity of firms, Journal of economic literature, 36(4): 1947-1982.
Dewi, S., Majid, M. S. A., Aliasuddin, A. & Kassim, S. H. (2018), Dynamics of financial development, economic growth and poverty alleviation: The Indonesian experience, The South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 13(1): 17-30.
EC. (2004). “Final report of the expert group: ‘Education for entrepreneurship’.” Brussels: Enterprise Directorate-General.
Elham Khorsand, Melika Malek Ara, & Ghayab Kowshari. (2022). Solutions for developing entrepreneurship and job creation in deprived areas. Specialized Scientific Quarterly of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 5(16), 114-120. (in Farsi)
Elhorst JP. (2010). Spatial panel data models. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, 377-407.
Elhorst, J. P. (2014). “Spatial Econometrics from Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Springer, Berlin, 37-93.
Folster, S. (2000). “Do entrepreneurs create jobs?” Small Business Economics, 14(2), 137–148.
Fritsch, M. (2008). How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue, Small Business Economics, 30(1): 1–14.
Fu, H. (2022). Evaluation model of employment and entrepreneurship of university students based on classification algorithm. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022.
Galindo-Martín, M. Á., Castaño-Martínez, M. S. & Méndez-Picazo, M. T. (2021), The role of entrepreneurship in different economic phases, Journal of Business Research, 122(June 2020): 171-179.
Garofoloi, G. (1994). New Firm Formation and Regional Development: The Italian Case,” Regional Studies, 28(4), 381-394.
Gomes, S., Ferreira, J., Lopes, J. M., & Farinha, L. (2022). “The impacts of the entrepreneurial conditions on economic growth: Evidence from OECD countries.” Economies, 10(7), 163.
Hamidi Razi, Davoud and Saif, Elah Murad (2016). "Effective factors on the energy consumption intensity index of the country's provinces, spatial dynamic panel data approach", Energy Economics Quarterly, 13(53), pp. 103-61. (in Farsi).
Hezar Jaribi, & Jafar. (2005). Examining the role of entrepreneurship in creating economic opportunities. Economic Journal, 5(18), 237-267. (in Farsi)
Iyortsuun, A. S., Goyit, M. G., & Dakung, R. J. (2021). Entrepreneurship education programme, passion and attitude towards self-employment. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(1), 64-85.
Jani, S., and Nik Pesyan, V., and Safizadeh, S. (2019). “Investigating the Impact of the Tourism Industry on Employment in the Country's Provinces with a Panel Spatial Econometric Approach”. Economic Researches and Policies, 28(93): 233-266 (in Farsi).
Jovanovic, B. (1982), “Selection and Evolution of Industry,” Econometrica, 50, 649-670.
Kanothi, R.N. (2009). The dynamics of entrepreneurship in ICT: Case of mobile phones downstream services in Kenya. Working Paper, No. 466, Institute of Social Science, The Netherlands.
Khodabakhshi, A., & Golzari, Z. (2022). The Impact of Entrepreneurship on the Economic Growth of Iran and Selected Countries in the Vision Document based on the General Employment Policies. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strate-gic Policies, 10(3), 564-585. (in Farsi)
Khodamoradpour, Zanganeh, & Ramezani. (2019). Recognizing the entrepreneurial opportunity, the foundation of sustainable employment. Applied Studies in Management and Development Sciences, 17(4), 13-22. (in Farsi)
Kisubi, M. K., Bonuke, R., & Korir, M. (2021). Entrepreneurship education and self-employment intentions: A conditional effect of entrepreneurial self-efficacy evidence from a developing country. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1938348.
Kitagawa, F., Marzocchi, C., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., & Uyarra, E. (2022). Anchoring talent to regions: the role of universities in graduate retention through employment and entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 56(6), 1001-1014.
Lesage, J. P. & Ficher, M. (2008), Spatial Growth Regression: Model Specification, Estimation and Interpretation, Spatial Economic Analysis, 3: 275–304.
Levine, R., & Rubinstein, Y. (2018). Selection into entrepreneurship and self-employment (No. w25350). National Bureau of Economic Research. ‏
Lucas, R. E. (1978). “On the Size Distribution of Business Firms,” Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 508-523.
Mahdavi, M., Nia, H. A., Hossein Ismail, Masoom, & Mojtabi Qadiri. (2005). Development of employment in rural areas. Geographical Researches, 36(2). (in Farsi)
Motalebi, Alizadeh, & Nazari Farsani. (2019). Examining the mutual relationship between entrepreneurship in industry, economic growth and employment in Iran using SUR and SVAR models. Scientific quarterly of applied economic theories, 6(3), 215-240. (in Farsi)
Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2000). Culture and Entrepreneurial Potential: A Nine Country Study of Locus of Control and Innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 51-75.
Neves, P. C., Afonso, Ó. & Silva, S. T. (2016). A meta-analytic reassessment of the effects of inequality on growth, World Development, 78: 386-400.
Oluremi HA, Agboola GM (2011) Environmental Factors and Entrepreneurship Development in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, (Volume 13, No.4, 2011) Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, Pennsylvania
Ongori, H., & Migiro, S. O. (2010). Information and communication technologies adoption in SMEs: literature review. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 93-104.
Otache, I., Oluwade, D. O., & Idoko, E. O. J. (2020). Entrepreneurship education and undergraduate students' self-employment intentions: do paid employment intentions matter? Education+ Training, 62(7/8), 741-757.
Peprah, A. A., & Adekoya, A. F. (2020). “Entrepreneurship and economic growth in developing countries: Evidence from Africa.” Business Strategy & Development, 3(3), 388-394.
Reynolds, Paul D. and Brenda Miller. (1987), 1986–87 Minnesota New Firm Survey, Minneapolis, MN: University Minnesota Center for Urban and Regional Affairs.
Robertson, J. (2004). Developing a knowledge management strategy. KM Column: Step Two Designs Pty Ltd.‏
Rytkönen, P. I., Oghazi, P., & Mostaghel, R. (2023). Food entrepreneurship and self-employment in an island context. British Food Journal, 125(13), 237-252.
Sunday, R. J., & Miriam, K. (2015). Entrepreneurship, employment and sustainable development in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 4(1), 179-199.
Tijani-Alawiye, B. (2004). Entrepreneurship Processes and Small Business Management, Ilaro, Nigeria.
Tran, T. (2019). Entrepreneurship, self-employment and job creation in Vietnam.
Urbano, D., Aparicio, S. & Audretsch, D. (2019), Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? Small Business Economics, 53(1): 21-49.
Van Stel, A. J., & Suddle, K. (2005). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. ERIM, Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
Van Stel, A., & Suddle, K. (2008). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 31-47.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). “Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data.” Small Business Economics,24, 335–350.
Zhu, R., Zhao, G., Long, Z., Huang, Y., & Huang, Z. (2022). Entrepreneurship or employment? A survey of college students’ sustainable entrepreneurial Intentions. Sustainability, 14(9), 5466.