پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

بررسی تأثیر پیچیدگی اقتصادی و مصرف انرژی تجدیدپذیر برآلودگی های زیست محیطی در کشورهای در حال توسعه

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری علوم اقتصادی ، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس ، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار علوم اقتصادی ، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس ، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس ، تهران، ایران
چکیده
با توجه به تهدیدهای فزاینده تغییرات آب و هوایی، نوآوری های فناورانه و کاهش آلودگی، به نیروهایی برای رشد اقتصادی بالاتر و محیط زیست بهتر تبدیل شده‌اند. در این پژوهش به بررسی اثرات پیچیدگی اقتصادی به عنوان شاخص تولید پیشرفته مبتنی بر دانش و مصرف انرژی تجدیدپذیر و همچنین اثرات متقابل آنها بر آلودگی محیط زیست در کشورهای در حال توسعه در دوره زمانی ‌2019-2000 با استفاده از روش GMM پرداخته شده است. نتایج به دست آمده نشان می دهد که شاخص پیچیدگی اقتصادی، تأثیر منفی و معناداری بر انتشار دی اکسید کربن در کشورهای در حال توسعه دارد. متغیرهایی مانند باز بودن تجارت و شدت انرژی، باعث افزایش انتشار دی اکسید کربن می‌شوند و فرضیه منحنی کوزنتس برای کشورهای در حال توسعه تأیید، و همچنین پیچیدگی اقتصادی در این کشورها، به حرکت رو به بالا در منحنی کوزنتس منجر می‌گردد. مصرف انرژی تجدیدپذیر، تأثیر معنادار بر کاهش انتشار دی اکسید کربن دارد و همچنین در سطوح بالاتر پیچیدگی اقتصادی، مصرف انرژی تجدیدپذیر باعث کاهش بیشتری در انتشار دی اکسید کربن می شود و از این رو باید کشورهای در حال توسعه سهم انرژی های تجدیدپذیر را با استفاده از فرایندهای نوآوری در بخش انرژی به طور قابل توجهی افزایش دهند که این امر سبب کاهش آلودگی های زیست محیطی در این کشورها می شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Impact of Economic Complexity and Renewable Energy Consumption on Environmental Pollution in Developing Countries

نویسندگان English

najme mohammadi 1
Bahram Sahabi 2
Hassan Heydari 3
Hossein Sadeghi 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associated Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Aim and Introduction

Technology provides an opportunity for the economy to move from polluting sources to renewable sources to meet energy needs. Increasing economic complexity means more use of technology and innovation in production and may cause the expansion of effective technological products such as renewable energy. In the past few decades, the share of renewable energy has increased due to a wide range of factors, such as government regulations to promote the use of renewable energy, reduction in the cost of installing renewable energy and increasing production capacity, oil price fluctuations, and the positive effects of renewable energy in reducing emissions. Carbon and innovation processes have increased in the energy sector. Therefore, in this research, the effects of renewable energy consumption and economic complexity as well as their mutual effects on environmental pollution have been investigated using the GMM method in developing countries over the period 2000-2019.

Methodology

In dynamic models, due to the presence of a lagged dependent variable, OLS or GLS methods cannot be used to estimate the model, because the disturbance components are correlated with the lagged dependent variable, and the estimation results are biased and inconsistent as before. Therefore, to solve this problem, the GMM method proposed by Arellano and Bond (1991) is used. The GMM estimator belongs to the set of instrumental variables’ estimators. In this method, in addition to solve the problem of the correlation of the independent variable with disturbance components, the endogeneity of the variables and the heteroscedasticity of the variances are also removed. It should be noted that this method is applicable when T (number of periods) is smaller than N (number of sections).

Results

The results show that the economic complexity index has a negative and significant effect on carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries. Variables such as trade openness and energy intensity increase carbon dioxide emissions, and the Kuznets curve hypothesis is confirmed for developing countries, and economic complexity leads to an upward movement of the Kuznets curve. Renewable energy consumption has a significant effect on reducing carbon dioxide emissions, and also at higher levels of economic complexity, renewable energy consumption causes a greater reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.

Conclusion and Discussion

The need for a more accurate understanding of economic phenomena has prompted economists to review previous theories and present new theories that have a new window to economic development literature. The goal of all countries is to achieve sustainable economic growth and development. Renewable energy technologies are promising, but there is very little information about its role as a limiting factor in reducing environmental pollution, especially in developing countries. Therefore, in this research, the effects of renewable energy consumption and economic complexity as well as their mutual effects on environmental pollution have been investigated using the GMM method in developing countries over the period 2000-2019. The results show that the economic complexity index has a negative and significant effect on the emission of carbon dioxide, so it can be said that for developing countries, moving towards a more knowledge-oriented economy can improve the quality of the environment. The variables of trade openness, energy intensity significantly affect positively CO2 emissions. The EKC hypothesis was confirmed with the positive logarithm of GDP per capita and its negative square coefficient. According to the results of the study, economic complexity in countries under study leads to an upward movement of EKC, which means that as economic complexity increases in developing countries due to increased energy demand, scale effects occur and lead to higher CO2 emissions.

In this study, energy intensity has a positive effect on the increase in carbon dioxide emissions and as a result the increase in environmental pollution in developing countries.

The specific result of this article is the significant effect of renewable energy consumption on the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries. At higher levels of economic complexity, renewable energy consumption causes a greater reduction in CO2 emissions. In terms of the role of complexity, it can be argued that in countries under consideration, the share of renewable energy should be significantly increased by using innovation processes in the energy sector. Considering the negative effects of the share of renewable energies on carbon dioxide emissions per capita, it is suggested to define new patterns of energy consumption by relying on renewable energies in development programs and using incentive tools to replace renewable energies instead of fossil fuels to reduce pollution. Developing countries should support knowledge-based industries, increase the import and production of environmentally friendly technologies, and increase the share of renewable energy in their plans to protect the environment. In addition, pricing strategies can be proposed to avoid increased fossil fuel consumption.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Economic complexity
Renewable energy consumption
Carbon dioxide emission
Environmental pollution
Developing Countries
سپهوند ،رامین ؛ سایه میری ،علی و شیرخانی ،اسما(1400). تأثیر پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر عملکرد زیست محیط در کشورهای منطقه منا, فصلنامه پژوهشهای اقتصادی ( رشد و توسعه پایدار) , سال بیست و یکم, شماره سوم, صفحات 177-208
سوری، علی (1394)؛ اقتصاد سنجی(پیشرفته) چاپ پنجم.، نشر فرهنگ شناسی
شاه آبادی، ابوالفضل و ارغند، هانیه(1397) تأثیر پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر رفاه اجتماعی در کشورهای منتخب درحال توسعه. پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، 23(89) صفحات :89-122
شاهمرادی بهروز (۱۳۹۷) اطلس پیچیدگی اقتصادی ،چاپ اول ،شرکت چاپ و نشر بازرگانی
زبیری، هدی و موتمنی، مانی(1399) سرمایه انسانی و پیچیدگی اقتصاد در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهشهای اقتصادی(رشد و توسعه پایدار) ، سال بیستم، شماره سوم، صفحات 166-145
عزیزی، زهرا ؛ دارایی، فاطمه و ناصری بروجنی، علیرضا (1398) .تأثیر پیچیدگی اقتصادی بر آلـودگی محیط زیست، سیاستگذاری پیشرفت اقتصادی، شماره(32)8 ،صفحات103 -137
Apergis N, Payne JE. (2010(Coal consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries, Energy Policy no 38(3), pp1353–1359.
Adewuyi AO, Awodumi OB (2017). Renewable and non-renewable energy growth emissions linkages: review of emerging trends with policy implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol 69, pp 275-291,
Awaworyi Churchill S, Inekwe J, Smyth R, Zhang X (2019). R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Economy; Vol 80, pp 7- 30.
Baltagi B H, (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data". John Wiley & Sons Ltd, the Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO198SQ, England.
Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Review; Vol 54, pp 838–845.
Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S, Apergis N (2015). The dynamic interaction between combustible renewables and waste consumption and international tourism: the case of Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res; Vol 22(16), pp 12050–61.
Breitenbach, M. C.; Chisadza, C; Clance, M. (2019). The Economic Complexity Index (ECI) and economic shocks: Developed vs developing countries, University of Pretoria, Working Paper, pp 2021-2025.
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, Vol 49(4), pp 431-455.
Doğan Buhari, Driha oana, Lorente Daniel Balsalobre & Shahzad Umer (2020). The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries, Sustainable Development. 2020;1–12.
Eyraud L, Clements B, Wane A (2013). Green investment: Trends and determinants. Energy Policy, Vol 60, pp 852–65.
Hausman et al. (2011). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Harvard.
Hausmann, R.; Hidalgo, C. A.; Bustos, S.; Coscia, M.; Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity. MIT Press.
Hausmann, D., Guevara, M., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristar´an, M., Hidalgo, C., )2017(. Linking economic complexity, institutions, and income inequality. World Dev. Vol 93, pp 75–93.
Hidalgo CA, Klinger B, Barabási A-L, Hausmann R) 2007(. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science; Vol 317(5837), pp 482–7.
Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, Vol 11(91), pp 3-39.
George N. Ike a, Ojonugwa Usmana, b, Andrew Adewale Alola c, d, Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie (2020), Environmental quality effects of income, energy prices and trade: The role of renewable energy consumption in G-7 countries, Science of the Total Environment Vol 721.
Gozgor G, Keung M, Chi Lau, Lu Z (2018). Energy consumption and economic growth: new evidence from the OECD countries. Energy Volume 153, pp 27-34.
Hu, G., Can S, and Paramati B, Doğan, and J. Fang. (2020), The Effect of Import Product Diversification on Carbon Emissions: New Evidence for Sustainable Economic Policies., Economic Analysis and Policy, no.65, pp198-210.
Kahia M, Kadria M, Ben Aissa MS, Lanouar C (2017). Modelling the treatment effect of renewable energy policies on economic growth: Evaluation from MENA countries. J Clean Prod Vol 149, pp 845–855.
Kayani GM, Ashfaq S, Siddique A (2020). Assessment of financial development on environmental effect: Implications for sustainable development. J Clean Prod, Vol 261.
Kumar R, Agarwala A (2016). Renewable energy technology diffusion model for techno-economics feasibility. Renew Sustain Energy Rev; Vol 54, pp 1515–1524
Khezri Mohsen, Heshmati Almas, Khodaei Mehdi, (2022). Environmental implications of economic complexity and its role in determining how renewable energies affect CO2 emissions, Applied Energy, Vol 306.
Mehdi BJ, Slim BY (2017). The role of renewable energy and agriculture in reducing CO2 emissions: Evidence for North Africa countries. Ecol Indic; Vol 74, pp 295–301.
Neagu O., Teodora, M.C., (2019). The relationship between economic complexity, energy consumption structure and greenhouse gas Emission: heterogeneous panel evidence from the EU countries. Sustainability Vol 11(2).
Oreiro, J. L., D’Agostini, L. L., & Gala, P. (2020). Deindustrialization, economic complexity and exchange rate overvaluation: the case of Brazil (1998-2017). PSL Quarterly Review, Vol 73(295), pp 313-341.
Pata, Ugur Korkut (2020), “Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Complexity, CO2 Emissions, and Ecological Footprint in the USA: Testing the EKC Hypothesis with a Structural Break”, Journal Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol.12, pp.11-39.
Popp D, Hascic I, Medhi N (2011). Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy. Energy Econ; Vol 33(4), pp 648–662.
Lapatinas, A. and Garas, A. and Boleti, E. and Kyriakou.V (2021), “Economic Complexity and Environmental Performance: Evidence from a World Sample, Environmental Modeling & Assessment Vol 26, pp 251–270
Swart, J., & Brinkmann, L. (2020). Economic complexity and the environment: Evidence from Brazil. Paper presented at the Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda, Vol 2030, pp3-45.
Stern, D.I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development. Vol 32(8), pp 1419- 1439.
Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). A review on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, Vol 649, pp 128-145
Rudolph A, Figge L (2017), “Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization?”,Ecol Indic Vol 81, pp 348-361.
Verbeek Marno (2012), A Guide to Modern Econometrics, 4nd edition
Zoundi Z (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sustain Energy Review; pp Vol 72, 1067–1075.