Economic Research and Perspectives

Economic Research and Perspectives

Privatization on Environmental Pollution in Iran: Application of TVP-VAR Method

Authors
Saman Ghaderi 1
Ramin Amani 2
Mahabad Amini 2
1 Assistant Professor in Economics and Faculty Member at University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
2 M.A in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Abstract
Aim and Introduction

Nowadays, the environmental impacts of human activities are considered one of the limitations of economic growth. Developing countries are facing the problem of environmental degradation, which hinders economic growth and development. On the other hand, the process of economic development of countries has become one of the environmental challenges and one of the most critical concerns of policymakers over the years. Due to the significant role of the government in the economy of the countries, government economic enterprises are also sources of pollution along with the private sector. The main reason is the unprecedented concentration of greenhouse gases, which leads to the intense and continuous production of carbon dioxide gas. In addition to being a dangerous factor for human health, air pollution also has an economic burden on societies, which causes a decrease in the quality of life and the welfare of society. Thus, developing countries, including Iran, are facing the problem of environmental degradation. Privatization can be a helpful policy and a government tool to influence economic productivity and social welfare through ecological pollution control. Most domestic research on privatisation's impact on environmental pollution has been interview-based and qualitative. For this reason, this research aims to investigate the impact of privatization on carbon dioxide emissions in Iran using the time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP – VAR) model. The model is considered dynamic due to the time factor, and the impact of privatization on environmental pollution in Iran can be accurately observed in different years.

Methodology

The present study investigates the impact of privatization on environmental pollution in Iran during 1991-2020 using the data of the Privatization Organization, the Central Bank of Iran, the World Bank, the Globalization Index website, and the energy balance sheet of the Ministry of Energy. Furthermore, the time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP – VAR) model has been used to study the relationship between variables. In this method, the optimal interval length of the model was determined first. Then, the data durability was checked through the unit root test of Zivot and Andrews (1992), considering the structural break. The next step examined cointegration tests, serial correlation, variance heteroscedasticity, and polynomial inverse root circle tests. In the end, the results of the impulse response function of the TVP – VAR model were presented. For this purpose, the emission rate of carbon dioxide has been used as an index of pollution, and the value of the transfer of shares and assets from the public sector to the private sector has been considered an index of privatization. The TVP – VAR method, unlike the vector autoregression model, allows the calculation of variable coefficients over time. Due to changing conditions, structural break and cyclical changes were observed in time series in macroeconomics. As a result, the TVP – VAR model enabled us to accurately obtain the nature of the economic structure’s temporal changes.

Findings

In this research, the mechanisms of the impact of privatization on environmental pollution have been analyzed, and the time series data of 1991-2020 and the TVP-VAR model have been used as experimental work. The present research findings show that despite the incomplete, unscientific, and politicized implementation of privatization in Iran, privatization has reduced the emission of carbon dioxide gas in Iran.

Discussion and Conclusion

Based on the results, the relationship between the privatization index and environmental pollution is confirmed. It indicates that privatization has a negative and significant effect on the emission of carbon dioxide in Iran. With the increase of privatization, pollution is decreased because when privatization increases, the productivity of labor and capital and the access to new technology for reducing pollutants is also increased. In developing countries like Iran, economic issues are prioritized over environmental considerations, leading to policymaking without considering environmental costs. In contrast, by including environmental calculations in the studies related to economic policies, it is possible to view the environmental damage caused. Based on the results, it is concluded that the economic globalization index, investment, gross domestic product without oil, and human development index have significant and positive effects on production and carbon dioxide emissions. When the size of the government increases, efficiency and productivity decrease. In Iran, one solution can be importing environment-friendly technologies and more investment in this area. According to the results, it can be seen that the increase in privatization can reduce greenhouse gases, and this is due to the rise in the efficiency of private companies in the exploitation and optimal use of natural resources. Thus, policymakers can consider privatization as a part of the solution to fight environmental pollution.

Keywords: Privatization, Environmental Pollution, Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP – VAR), Iran

JEL Classification: C22, L33, Q53
Keywords
Privatization
Environmental pollution
Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregression (TVP – VAR)
Iran

Subjects

احمدوند، محمدرحیم (1392)، واکاوی عملکرد خصوصی‌سازی در ایران، فصلنامه سیاست‌های مالی و اقتصادی ویژه‌نامه کارنامه اقتصادی دولت، سال یکم، شماره 2، صفحات 182-143.
آرین ‌مهر، شهرام، یحیی ‌آبادی، ابوالفضل و هرتمنی، امیر (1392)، بررسی تأثیر خصوصی‌سازی بر رشد اقتصادی در کشورهای عضو گروه دی-8 با استفاده از مدل پانل پویای برآورد شده به روش مربعات تعمیمم‌یافته، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی، پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، سال 4 شماره 13.
بلالی، حمید، زمانی، امید و یوسفی، علی (1392)، بررسی رابطه رشد اقتصادی و آلودگی زیست‌محیطی در بخش نفت با تاکید بر نوسانات قیمت آن (مطالعه موردی اقتصاد ایران)، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی، برنامه‌ریزی و بودجه، سال هجدهم شماره3.
پژویان، جمشید و مرادحاصل، نیلوفر (1386)، بررسی اثر رشد اقتصادی بر آلودگی هوا، پژوهش‌های اقتصادی،سال هفتم، شماره 4.
پوراحمدی، معین، مختاریان‌پور، مجید و حسنقلی‌پور یاسوری، طهمورث (1397)، آسیب‌شناسی اجرای خط‌مشی‌های خصوصی‌سازی در ایران، فصلنامه مدیریتی دولتی، دوره 10، شماره 3، صفحات 333-356.
پوراصغر سنگاچین، فرزام (1394)، شاخص‌های توسعه پایدار از MDGS تا SDGS وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی.
جعفری صمیمی، احمد، قادری سامان، قادری، صلاح الدین و کتابی طه (1392)، بررسی اثر باز بودن تجاری و جهانی شدن اقتصادی بر اشتغال: رویکرد آزمون کرانه‌ها، فصلنامه تحقیقات مدل‌سازی اقتصادی، شماره 13.
حیدری، حسن، نظریان، علمناز، فعالجو، حمیدرضا و محمدزاده، یوسف (1392)، سرمایه اجتماعی، سرمایه سلامت و رشد اقتصادی در کشورهای خاورمیانه، فصلنامه رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، سال 3، شماره 11.
سعدی، علی، حقیقی، مسعود ( 1375 )، افزایش بهره‌وری حاصل از خصوصی‌سازی، ماه‌نامه رشد مدیریت شما.
شفیعی، عطیه (1398) بررسی چالش های خصوصی سازی در اقتصاد ایران و مطالعه موردی بر صنعت نفت، همایش ملی پژوهش های مدیریت و علوم انسانی در ایران، دوره 6.
ضیایی بیگدلی، محمدرضا (1391)، حقوق بین الملل عمومی، دوره 42، گنج دانش.
علی محمد، فرهاد (1388)، بررسی مقایسه‌ای عملکرد شرکت‌های خصوصی شده قبل و بعد از واگذاری، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد واحد علوم و تحقیقات.
کیان‌پور، سعید (1388)، بررسی اجمالی خصوصی‌سازی در چند کشور منتخب با اشاره‌ای بر سیاسیت‌های کلی اصل 44، مجله بررسی‌های بازرگانی، شماره 38.
مترجمین، ندافی، کاظم، حسنوند، محمد صادق (2016)، گزارش بانک جهانی در سال 2016: اثرات بهداشتی و اقتصادی آلودگی هوا. مرکز تحقیقات آلودگی هوا، پژوهشکده محیط‌ زیست دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران.
شهاب، محمدرضا و صدرآبادی، ناصر (1392)، بررسی اثر سیاست‌های اقتصادی دولت بر کیفیت محیط‌زیست درکشورهای منتخب، علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، دوره16، شماره 2.
محمد علیخانی، سلیمه، آصف‌زاده، سعید، محبی‌فر، رفعت، منتظری، علی (1391)، بررسی شاخص توسعه انسانی(HDI) در ایران و کشورهای منتخب، فصلنامه پایش، سال یازدهم، شماره 14، صفحات 415-423.
مشهدی، علی (1395) دولت و محیط زیست: از رویکردهای بدون دولت تا رویکردهای مشارکتی، فصلنامه دولت پژوهی، دوره 2، شماره 8، صفحات 59-80.
مشهدی، علی و شاه حسینی، عطیه (1395)، خصوصی سازی مسئولیت در جبران خسارات زیست محیطی؛ گذار از مسئولیت بین المللی دولت به مسئولیت متصدیان خصوصی فعالیت های خطرناک، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوقی خصوصی، دوره 47، شماره 2، صفحات 345-362.
مهربان‌فر، احسان (1395)، آسیب‌شناسی خط‌مشی‌گذاری دولت در عرصه خصوصی‌سازی بر مبنای نظریه داده بنیاد، فصلنامه مجلس و راهبرد، سال 23، شماره صفحه 86.
نصراللهی، زهرا و غفاری، مرضیه (1394)، آلودگی هوا در صنایع تولیدی ایران (مطالعه موردی انتشار CO2 و NOx ناشی از مصرف سوخت‌های فصیلی)، فصلنامه مطالعات تجربی اقتصاد ایران، شماره 1.
هوشمند، محمود، فرمانبر، محمد و کیوانفر، محمد (1389)، تحلیل عملکرد شرکت‌های واگذار شده به بخش خصوصی (از طریق بورس اوراق بهادار) طی برنامه سوم توسعه، مجله دانش و توسعه (علمی - پژوهشی) سال 17، شماره 33.
وزارت نیرو، دفتر برنامه‌ریزی انرژی (1379-1386)، ترازنامه انرژی.
Andre, F. J., Gonzalez, P., and Porteiro, N. (2009). Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57, pp, 182–194.
Arocena, P., and Price, C. W. (2002). Generating efficiency: Economic and environmental regulation of public and private electricity generators in Spain. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, pp, 41–69.
Beladi, H. and Chao, C.C. (2006) Does Privatization Improve the Environment? Economics Letters, 93, 343-347.
Bernauer, T., Koubi, V. (2006), States as Providers of Public Goods: How Does Government Size Affect Environmental Quality? Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=900487
Boubakri, N., Smaoui, H., and Zammiti, M. (2009), Privatization Dynamic and Economic Growth, Journal of Business and Policy Research, pp, 16-44.
Carter, C. K., and Kohn, R. (1994). On Gibbs Sampling for State Space Models. Biometrika, 81(3), 541–553.
Chang, L., Li, W., and Lu, X. (2013). Government engagement, environmental policy, and environmental performance: evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms. Bus. Strategy Environ.
Cheremisin, off., Nicholas, P., and Timothy, D. Van Epp. (1999), Privatization and the Environment: Stud-ies from Russia and Ukraine. Environment Department, World Bank, Washington, DC.
De Jong, D. J., and De Jonge, V. N. (1995). Dynamics and distribution of microphytobenthic chlorophyll-a in the Western Scheldt estuary (SW Netherlands). Hydrobiologia, 311(1), 21-30.
Del Negro, M., and Otrok, C. (2008). Dynamic Factor Models with Time-Varying Parameters: Measuring Changes in International Business Cycles, Staff Reports 326, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Durbin, J., and Koopman, S. J. (2001). Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods.
Durbin, J., and Koopman, S. J. (2002). A Simple and Efficient Simulation Smoother for State Space Time Series Analysis. Biometrika, 89(3), 603–615.
Earnhart, D. and Lizal. L. (2006), Effects of ownership and financial performance on corporate environmental performance, Journal of Comparative Economics, 34, 111–129.
Filipovic, A. (2006), Impact of Privatization on Economic Growth, Undergraduate Economic Review.
Frederik, C., Lundström, S., (2001), Political and economic freedom and the environment: the case of CO2 emissions. Working Paper in Economics no. 29. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (1992) Data Augmentation and Dynamic Linear Models. Forschungsberichte / Institut für Statistik, 28. Department of Statistics and Mathematics, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.
Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17.
https://www.sdgindex.org/reports/sustainable-development-report-2021/
Kim, C. and Nelson, C. (1999) State-Space Models with Regime-Switching: Classical and Gibbs-Sampling Approaches with Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Korobilis, D. (2013). Assessing the Transmission of Monetary Policy Using Time-varying Parameter Dynamic Factor Models*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(2), 157-179.
Larrue, C. (2000). Analyser les politiques publiques d'environnement, Editions L'Harmattan.
Lopez, R. E., Galinato, G.I., Islam, F. (2011), Fiscal spending and the environment: theory and empirics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62, pp, 180–198.
Lopez, R.E., and Palacios, A. (2010), Have government spending and energy tax policies contributed to make Europe environmentally cleaner? Working Papers 94795. University of Maryland, Maryland.
Lovei, M. B. (2002), the Environmental Implications of Privatization Lessons for Developing Countries. The World Bank Washington, D.C. World Bank discussion paper no. 426.
Manag, Sh., Hibiki, A. and Tsurumi, T. (2009), Does trade openness improve environmental quality?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58, pp, 346–363.
Matisoff, D. C. (2012). Privatizing Climate Change Policy: Is there a Public Benefit? Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(3), 409-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9568-0
Odum, E.P., and Barrett, G.W. (2005), Fundamentals of Ecology, 5th edn. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
Okten, C., and Peren, A. (2006), The Effects of Privatization on Efficiency. How Does Privatization Work? Journal of World Development, 1537-1556.
O'Neill, J., Holland, A., and Light, A. (2008), Environmental Values. Routledge, London.
Pal, A.R., and Saha, D. (2015). Pollution tax, partial privatization and environment, Contents lists available at Science Direct, Resource and Energy Economics 40, 19–35.
Pi, J., Yang, L., and Zhou, Y. (2013), Privatization and Environmental Pollution in a Mixed Duopoly. Zb. Rad. Ekon. Fak. Rij, 163-192.
Porter, M.E. (1991), America's Green Strategy. Scientific American. 264, No. 4.
Prizzia, Ross. (2001). The Impact of Development and Privation on Environmental Protection: an International Perspective. Professional Studies Division, University of Hawaii-West Oahu, pp, 96-129.
Rajabi Kouyakhi, N., & Shavvalpour, S. (2021). The driving forces of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in Iran's electricity sector: A decomposition analysis based on types of ownership. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2, 100012. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100012
Talukdar, D., & Meisner, C. M. (2001). Does the Private Sector Help or Hurt the Environment? Evidence from Carbon Dioxide Pollution in Developing Countries. World Development, 29(5), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00008-0
Tsai. T.H., Wan. C.C. and Chiou, J.R. (2016). Can privatization be a catalyst for environmental R&D and result in a cleaner environment?. Resource and Energy Economics 43, 1–13
Ulph, A., and Ulph, D. (2007). Climate change-environmental and technology policies in a strategic context. Environ. Resour. Econ.37, 159–180.
Vivien, F.D. (2006)."Quelle économie pour l’environnement? Quel environnement pour l’économie?” Journée d’étude: Environnement et développement durable: quelles approches en sciences sociales.
West, M., and Harrison, J. (1997). Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.
World Bank (1999). Private capital flows to developing countries: The road to financial integration, World Bank Policy Research Report Series, New York, Oxford University Press.
World Bank (2000). Privatization and the Environment: Les-sons Learned and Perspectives from Experience in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. Environment De-partment Research Paper. World Bank, Washing-ton, D.C. Processed.
World Health, O. (2016). World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206498
Xing, M. and Tan, T. (2021) Environmental attitudes and impacts of privatization on R&D, environment and welfare in a mixed duopoly, Economic Research, 34(1), 807-827.
Zivot, E., and Andrews, D.W.K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-70.
Economic Research and Perspectives
Volume 23, Issue 2
Summer 2023
Pages 27-65