پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

تحلیل فضایی اثر آزادسازی تجاری بر نرخ بیکاری در استان های ایران

نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه ارومیه
2 دانشجوی دکتری توسعه اقتصادی، گروه اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه ارومیه
چکیده
بیکاری یکی از مهم ترین معضلاتی است که اثرات مختلف و متنوع اقتصادی، سیاسی، فرهنگی و اجتماعی را به همراه دارد. در این میان، آزادسازی تجاری به عنوان نماد اصلی جهانی شدن و مهم ترین نیروی پیش برنده است که می تواند اثرات اقتصادی متعددی از قبیل افزایش کارآیی عوامل تولید، ارتقاء سرمایه گذاری در نیروی انسانی و سرمایه فیزیکی داشته باشد، همچنین در قسمت هایی که از مزیت نسبی برخودار بوده است می تواند به افزایش تولید ناخالص داخلی و به تبع آن، کاهش نرخ بیکاری منجر گردد. از این رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تأثیر آزادسازی تجاری بر نرخ بیکاری در استان های کشور با رویکرد اقتصادسنجی فضایی طی بازه زمانی 98-1385 است. پیش از تخمین مدل فضایی، با استفاده از آزمون های وابستگی تشخیصی فضایی موران و جری سی، اثرات سرریز فضایی مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده، شاخص آزادسازی تجاری و اثرات مجاورت آن، اثرات مثبت و معنی داری بر کاهش نرخ بیکاری استان های مورد مطالعه دارد. نتایج تحقیق، حاکی از آن می باشد که آزادسازی تجاری به عنوان یک متغیر مهم در مطالعات منطقه ای اشتغال، در استان های مجاور با استان های دارای نرخ بیکاری بالا، باید لحاظ گردد (اثرات سرریز فضایی). همچنین با توجه به سایر نتایج، مشاهده شده است که تولید ناخالص داخلی و اعتبارات تملک دارایی های سرمایه ای (عمرانی)، تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر کاهش نرخ بیکاری دارند؛ در حالی که، نرخ تورم و نرخ دستمزد، دارای رابطه منفی و معنی داری با کاهش نرخ بیکاری استان ها دارند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Spatial Analysis of the Effect of Trade Liberalization on the Unemployment Rate in the Provinces of Iran

نویسندگان English

hasan heydari 1
vahid nikpey pesyan 2
1 Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University
2 PhD student in Economics, Department of Economics and Management, Urmia University
چکیده English

Aim and Introduction

Unemployment is a major issue in developing countries. The high rate of unemployment means that the country does not use the workforce effectively. Unemployment is the worst economic problem due to its negative impact on the individual and society and the speed of its spread in the world. Therefore, solving the problem of unemployment is one of the most important goals of institutions. Trade liberalization is one of the effective factors in reducing the unemployment rate.

Globalization is an inevitable process with different economic, social and political aspects. Meanwhile, trade liberalization is considered as the main symbol of globalization and its most important driving force. Therefore, considering the high unemployment rate in most of the provinces of Iran, with the increase in commercial liberalization in line with the economic growth and development, it can be seen in the sectors that have a relative advantage. Increasing national security and political and economic stability provides the necessary infrastructure to attract foreign investors. Therefore, by increasing trade liberalization, it is possible to overcome many economic and political problems in the provinces of Iran, and its effects will spill over to the provinces with the high unemployment rate and will increase economic growth, will increase gross domestic product and finally will reduce the unemployment rate in the provinces of the country.

Methodology

In spatial econometrics, spatial effects are added to the performance of periodic or complex regression models (panels). Therefore, in spatial econometrics, sample information has a spatial component. When data has a spatial component, two issues can be discussed: (1) Spatial dependence, and (2) Spatial heterogeneity. Before estimating spatial panel models, we need to perform spatial dependence tests and to check the existence of autocorrelation between disturbance terms. The existence of spatial coherence between observations and spatial autocorrelation between disturbance terms indicates the need to use spatial panel models. To do this, Moran, Jerry C, and Jetis Ord J tests are used. The Moran test examines the assumption of spatial autocorrelation between disturbance terms. In spatial econometric models, to model spatial reactions, it is necessary to select the numerical value of spatial directions. For this purpose, we have two sources of assumptions: (1) Position on the coordinate plane, which is expressed by latitude and longitude, so that the distance of any point in the location, or distance of any observation located at any point relative to fixed or central points or observations can be calculated. (2) The source of spatial information is neighborhood and neighborhood, which expresses the relative location in the space of an observed peripheral unit, compared to other such scales.

Findings

In this study, the impact of trade liberalization on the unemployment rate in the provinces of Iran over the period 2006-2019 was investigated with a spatial econometric approach. First, to check the spatial dependence, the spatial dependence of the provinces was confirmed by the Moran and Jerry C test, and based on the significance of the above tests, the research model was estimated in the spatial panel model. According to the results, trade liberalization shows positive effects on reducing the unemployment rate of these provinces, and this result is compatible with the results of other studies including Yanıkkaya (2008), Li et al (Li & et al., 2020), Adou (2021), Amini and Muradzad (2014) and Samimi et al (2014). The variables of gross domestic product and construction credits have positive and significant effects on reducing the unemployment rate. However, the inflation rate and the wage rate have negative and significant effects on reducing the unemployment rate of the provinces of Iran.

Discussion and Conclusion

Since according to the research literature, part of the unemployment rate is reduced through various channels such as trade liberalization, attracting foreign investment and export, considering that macroeconomic decisions are made in the center of the country, it is suggested It is possible, taking into account the increase in regional and provincial decision powers, it is possible to achieve favorable economic effects in the direction of improving macro-economic variables, policy and regional planning.

The cooperation between the central government and the provincial centers increases the security of the region (country). As a result, high security encourages foreign investment, increases the stability of the economic policy, facilitates the laws and removes obstacles. National security increases the degree of commercial openness, increases production and reduces the unemployment rate.

To achieve a balanced and convergent regional development and to resolve the spatial and financial disparities and heterogeneities of the country's provinces, it is suggested that the allocation of budget resources to the less developed provinces should be increased. And the share of allocation of budget resources of different provinces should be converged. As a result, the provinces of the country, especially the less developed provinces should be able to flourish as much as possible from the point of view of economic growth and unemployment rate reduction.

The lack of economic infrastructure in rural areas, especially in the industrial sector, increases the rate of emigration and the overflow of labor to urban areas. Therefore, the improvement of economic infrastructure and the increase of trade liberalization policies lead to the improvement of technology and innovation in the less developed regions, and ultimately lead to a decrease in the unemployment rate in the province level.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Trade Openness
Unemployment
Provincial competition
Spatial Econometrics
اکبری، نعمت الله (1384). مفهوم فضا و چگونگی اندازه‌گیری آن در مطالعات منطقه‌ای، فصلنامه پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران، 7(23)، 39-68.
اکبری، نعمت الله و عسگری، علی (1382). روش شناسی اقتصادسنجی فضایی، تئوری و کاربرد، مجله پژوهشی دانشگاه اصفهان، جلد دوازدهم، 1(2)، سال، 93-122.
امینی، علیرضا و کریمی، شیوا و بیرمی، مسعود (1392). تحلیل رابطه آزادسازی تجاری و اشتغال زنان در ایران: مطالعه موردی کارگاه‌های صنعتی، فصلنامه پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، 67، 183-209.
امینی، علیرضا و مراد زاده، سلاله (1394). تحلیل تاثیر آزادسازی تجاری بر نرخ بیکاری: مطالعه موردی کشورهای منتخب در حال توسعه، فصلنامه علوم اقتصادی، 31(9)، 77-93.
برقی اسکویی ، محمد مهدی (1387). آثار آزادسازی تجاری (با تأکید بر تعرفه‌ها ) بر اشتغال و توزیع درآمد در ایران با استفاده از مدل تعادل عمومی قابل محاسبه، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، رساله دکتری.
جانی، سیاوش و نیک‌پی پسیان، وحید و صفی زاده، سیما (1399). بررسی تاثیر صنعت گردشگری بر اشتغال در استان‌های کشور با رویکرد اقتصادسنجی فضایی تابلویی، پژوهش‌ها و سیاست-های اقتصادی، 28(93)، 233-266.
جعفری صمیمی، احمد، قادری، سامان، قادری، صلاح الدین، کتابی، طه (1392). بررسی اثر باز بودن تجاری و جهانی شدن اقتصادی بر اشتغال: رویکرد آزمون کرانه‌ها، فصلنامه تحقیقات مدل‌سازی اقتصادی، 1(3)، 26-1.
رضایی، محسن (1397). ارزیابی ، علل و پیامدهای عمده بحران اقتصادی در ایران، فصلنامه اقتصاد مالی، 12(42)، 201-227.
فرجادی، غلامعلی و جلالی نائینی، سید احمدرضا و قادر پناه، وحید (1397). تاثیر آزادسازی تجاری بر سهم تقاضای نیروی کار دانش آموخته دانشگاهی در کل نیروی کار، فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی و بودجه، 22(3)، 61-84.
نونژاد، مسعود و فرهنگ دوست، محمد (1397). آثار جمعیت شهری و روستایی و باز بودن تجاری، مطالعات اقتصاد، مدیریت مالی و حسابداری، 4(1)، 1-14.
Acemoglu, D. (2003). Labour- and capital-augmenting technical change. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(1), 1–37.
Adou, Niango Sika Antoine Brice (2021). Trade Openness and Employment, Implications on Urbanisation in Sub-Saharan Africa, Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/104317/ MPRA Paper No. 104317, posted 03 Dec 2020 13:54 UTC.
Ahmadi Pur, Z. Jafarzadeh, H. Mirzaie M.R. (2014). Functional analysis of country divisions in implementation of land planning programs with emphasis on Iran, Regional Planning Quarterly, 14th year, No. 14, Marvdasht, pp. 1-12 [In Persian].
Amerah M, Khasawneh M (1993) Unemployment in Jordan: dimensions and prospects. Center for international studies, pp. 1–56.
Anbaraki L, Ismaili B (2020) Investigating the relationship between drug addiction among youth and unemployment and its impact on urban security in bushehr province. Boushehr Danesh Entezami 10(39):53–64.
Brros, C. P., & Gupta, R. (2017). Development, Poverty and Inequality: A Spatial Analysis of South African Provinces. The Journal of Developing Areas, 51(1), 19-32.
Burange, L. G., Renadive, R. R., & Karnik, N. N. (2019). Trade openness and economic growth nexus: A case study of BRICS. Foreign Trade Review, 54(1), 1–15.
Chandran V.G.R., (2009)" Trade openness and manufacturing growth" in malaysig, journal of policy modeling, 31, pp 637-647.
Dadashpor, H., Alizadeh, B., & Madani, B. (2011). Investigating and Analyzing the Trend of Development and Spatial Inequalities in West Azarbayejan Province. Journal of Social Sciences, 53, 173-208.
Dutt. p, devashish m, Ranjan. p, International trade and unemployment: theory and cross-national evidence, journal of international economics 78 (2009) 32–44.
Elhorst JP (2010). Spatial panel data models. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, 377-407.
Gao G, Liu B, Kouassi I (2017) The contemporaneous effect of unemployment on crime rates: the case of Indiana. Southwestern Economic Review 44:99–107.
Goldberg, P., & Pavcnik, N. (2003). The response of the informal sector to trade liberalization. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 463–496.
Grossman, G., & Helpman, H. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy, MIT Press.
Hala Hjazeen, Mehdi Seraj and Huseyin Ozdeser (2021). The nexus between the economic growth and unemployment in Jordan, Futur Bus J 2021, 7(1):42 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00088-3.
Harrison, A. & Hanson, G. (1999). Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzle. Journal of Development Economics, 59(1999),125–154.
Hekmatneia, H.Mousavi.M.N.(2013). Application of the model in geography with emphasis on urban and regional planning. Azad Peyama Publication, Third Edition, Tehran [In Persian]
Kanbur, R., & Venables, A. J. (2005). Spatial Inequality and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Karimi Moghari, Z., & Barati, J. (2017). Determining the Level of Regional Inequality in Iran's Provinces: Multi-dimensional Composite Index Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Studies, 7(26), 49-70.
Khalesi, G., & Piraei, Kh. (2014). Relationship between Economic Growth and Income Inequality Iran's Provinces. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 16(2), 155-171.
Knudsen, C (2002), Shift-share Analysis, Further Examination of Models for the Description of Economic change, Department of Geography, Bloomington, USA.
Kuete, A. S. N. & Voufo, T. B. (2016). How does trade openness affects women’s job opportunity and earnings in Cameroon? Working Paper, Available at www. researchgate.net/BelmondoTanankem voufo.
Lesage, J P. (1999). Spatial Econometrics. University of Toledo. Getis, A., Ord, J.K. (1992). The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics.Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 189-206.
Levin, A., Lin, C.F. and Chu, J. (2002), “Unit root in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 108 No. 1, pp. 1-24.
Li, G., & Fang, C. (2013). Analyzing the Multi-Mechanism of Regional Inequality in China. The Annals of Regional Science, 52(1), 155-182.
Li, p, & Li, z & Tao, R, Su, CH. (2020). How does trade openness affect female labours? The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/0143-7720.htm
Liao, F. H., & Wei, Y. D. (2015). Space, Scale, and Regional Inequality in Provincial China: A Spatial Filtering Approach. Applied Geography, 61, 94-104.
Nagelhout GE, Hummel K, de Goeij MC, de Vries H, Kaner E, Lemmens P (2017) How economic recessions and unemployment affect illegal drug use: a systematic realist literature review. Int J Drug Policy 44:69–83.
Ngouhouo, Ibrahim; Nchofoung, Tii Njivukuh, (2020). Does Trade Openness Affects Employment in Cameroon? Foreign Trade Review, (), 001573252096130–. doi:10.1177/0015732520961307
Njikam, O. (2016). Trade liberalisation, labour market regulations and labour demand in Cameroon. International Review of Economics and Finance, 34(C), 525–541.
https://www.amar.org.ir/
Njikam, O., & Cockburn, J. (2011). Trade liberalization and productivity growth: Firmlevel evidence from Cameroon. The Journal of Developing Areas, 279–302.
Pankaj, V. (2015). Creating manufacturing jobs in India: Has openness to trade really helped? Indian Council for Research on international Economic Relations Working Paper 303.
Philip Nwosa & Sunday Keji & Samuel Adegboyo & Oluwadamilola Fasina, (2020). "Trade Openness And Unemployment Rate In Nigeria," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 52-62, September.
Sabbagh Kermani, Majid, Jamshidi, Ramadan (2001), Analysis of the growth trend of employment and its structural changes in the industrial sector and various provinces of Iran, Economic research.pp4-16 [In Persian]
‌Thurlow, J. (2006). Trade liberalization and pro-poor growth in South Africa. Trade and Poverty Project, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
UNCTAD. (2013). Implications of global value chains for trade, investment, development and jobs, 20.
Wei, Y. H. D. & C. C. Fan (2000) Regional inequality in China: A case study of Jiangsu province. Professional Geographer, 52, 455-469.
Liao, Felix Haifeng and Wei, Yehua Dennis. (2016). Sixty Years of Regional Inequality in China: Trends, Scales and Mechanisms. Working Paper Series N° 202. Rimisp, Santiago, Chile.
Glauben, T., T. Herzfeld, S. Rozelle & X. B. Wang (2012) Persistent Poverty in Rural China: Where, Why, and How to Escape? World Development, 40, 784-795.
Yanıkkaya, Halit. (2008). Is trade liberalization a solution to the unemployment problem? Turkish economic association discusstion paper. 2008/17 http ://www.tek. org.tr.