پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

پژوهش ها و چشم اندازهای اقتصادی

مطالعه اثرات مدل سازی و پیشنهاد رفتار صادرات نفت پساتحریمی ایران در چارچوب تحلیل روابط استراتژیک بازار نفت

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسنده
استادیار اقتصاد دانشکده اقتصاد دانشگاه اصفهان
چکیده
در پژوهش حاضر، تحلیل رفتار استخراج و صادرات نفت ایران در چارچوب عضویت در اوپک به عنوان بازیگری مهم در بازار نفت و ارائه پیشنهاد سیاستی بر این اساس در شرایط جدید مدنظر بوده است. تحلیل روابط استراتژیک، نشان می دهد که کشورهای نفتی، با توجه به مؤلفه های اقتصادی، دموگرافیگ و نفتی و نیاز به درآمد نفتی، تمایزاتی دارند که آنها را در قالب یک طیف بندی از کشور خرج کننده تا پس اندازکننده، با شدت تنزیل و بی صبری متفاوت، تقسیم کرده است و این گونه شناسی و چانه زنی میان این طیف، تا حد زیادی تکلیف رفتار و بازی درون اوپک را در خصوص سهمیه ها تعیین می کند. بر این اساس، پس از استخراج مدل به صورتی نوآورانه و تخمین آن برای دوره ۲۰۱۷-۲۰۰۱، نتایج نشان دهنده رابطه قوی و معنادار رفتار و شدت تنزیل کشورهای نفتی با مؤلفه های فوق الذکر است؛ بویژه بازار نفت با تشدید بی صبری و افزایش تمایل عمومی برای تسریع صادرات، در واکنش به ظهور نفت شیل و تغییر چشم انداز بازار نفت، مواجه است. بر این اساس، به نظر می رسد، نقش کنونی ایران در اوپک، نابهینه است و مؤلفه های اقتصادی، جمعیتی و نفتی کشور، همگی دال بر ضرورت اتخاذ استراتژی ارتقای ظرفیت استخراج و نرخ بازیافت توسط ایران، ضمن حفظ عضویت در اوپک است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Modeling the Petroleum Export Behavior of Iran after Oil Sanction in the Framework of Analysis of the Strategic Relations of the Oil Market

نویسنده English

shahram moeeni
Assistant Professor in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

The present study seeks to analyze Iran's oil extraction and export behavior within the framework of membership in OPEC as an important player in the oil market and to propose a policy for the post-sanction period. The analysis of strategic relations shows that oil economies differ in terms of the economic, demographic and petroleum components, and the need for oil revenues. Thus, these countries can be classified into two types of saver and expender, with different rates of depreciation. This typology and bargaining between the two groups largely determines the behavior of the players within OPEC. Accordingly, after designing an innovative model and estimating it during 2001-2017, the results indicate a strong and significant relationship between discount rate of oil countries with the previous components. In particular, oil market faces an increasing impatience and general tendency to accelerate oil exports in response to the emergence of shale oil and the change in oil market outlook. Accordingly, Iran's current role in OPEC seems nonoptimal, and economic, demographic and oil components indicate the need to adopt and enhance Iran's extraction capacity and recovery rates, while continuing membership in OPEC.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Oil Market
Shale Oil
game theory
Sacrifice Ratio
Impatience
Abdoli, Ghahraman (1392). Application of Fioron's theory in the study of the stability of OPEC: with the approach of the theory of repetitive games. Quarterly Journal of Energy Economics, 6 (20), 33-56.
Moeeni, Shahram,and foruharmanesh, hadi. (1395). Sustainability Analysis of the OPEC Oil Consortium, Ratio Approach, Quarterly Journal of Applied Economics Theory, 3 (3), 1-24.
Nazari, Navid, and khakestari, Marzieh (1394). Analysis of the Iranian approach in the oil market using cooperative games and examining the effect of sanctions on oil revenues. Quarterly Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 6 (21), 194-219.
Adelman, M. A. (2002). “World Oil Production and Prices: 1947-2000,” in Oil and the Economy: Recent Experience in Historical Perspective, James L. Smith, ed., Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42( 2), 169-191.
Alhajji, A. F., and David Huettner (2000a). “The Target Revenue Model and the World Oil Market: Empirical Evidence from 1971 to 1994,” The Energy Journal, 21(2), 121-143.
Alhajji, A. F., and David Huettner (2000b). “OPEC and World Crude Oil Markets from 1973 to 1994: Cartel, Oligopoly, or Competitive?” The Energy Journal, 21(3), 31-60.
Berhman, J.R. and Craig, S.G., (1987). The distribution of public services: an exploration of local government preferences. American Economic Review, 77, 315-332.
Brémond, V., & Hache, E, & Mignon, V.(2012). Does OPEC still exist as a cartel? An empirical investigation. Energy Economics, 34(1), 125-131.
BP, (2017). BP statistical review of world energy. Centeral Intelligence Agency, Office of Economic Research, International oil Devlopment. Various issues.
Dahl, C., & Yücel, M., (1989). Dynamic Modeling and testing of OPEC Behavior. Research, Paper 8917, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
Danielsen, A. (1980). The theory and measurement of OPEC stability. Southern Economic Journal, 47(1), 51-65.
Danielson, A., & Kim, S. (1988). OPEC stability: an empirical assessment. Energy Economics, 10(3), 174-184.
Fattouh, B., & Sen, A. (2016). The dynamics of the revenue maximization–market share trade-off: Saudi Arabia’s oil policy in the 2014–15 price fall.Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(2), 223–240.
Gatley, D., & Javid, M. (2014). Analysis of Saudi Arabia's behavior within OPEC and the world oil market. Energy Policy, 64,209-225.
Graaf, V.D. (2017). Is OPEC dead? Oil exporters, the Paris agreement and the transition to a post-carbon world, Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 182-188.
Griffin, J. M. (1988). OPEC behavior; a test of alternative hypothesis. American economic Review, 75(5), 954-963.
Huntington, H., & Al-Fattah, S., & Huang, Z., (2013). Oil Markets and Price Movements: A Survey of Models. USAEE Working Paper, No.13, 129-163.
Hnyilicza, E., & R.S. Pindyck, (1976). Pricing Policies for a Two-Part Exhaustible Resource Cartel: The Case of OPEC, European Economic Review, 1-26.
Kisswani, K. (2016). Does OPEC act as a cartel? empirical investigation of coordination behavior. Energy Policy, 97,171-180.
Noguera, j. P. R. A. (2007). OPEC and the international oil market: can a cartel fuel the engine of economic development?. International journal of Industerial Maganizath, 25(0), 187-199.
Okullo, S., & Reynes, F. (2016). Imperfect cartelization in OPEC. VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM).
OPEC Annual Statistical Bulletin. (2001-2017). ISSN. 475 – 0608.
Ramcharran, H. (2002). Oil production responses to price changes: an empirical application of the competitive model to OPEC and non-OPEC countries, Energy Economics, 24(2), 97-106.
Wirl. F. (2008). Why do oil prices jump (or fall)? Energy Policy Energy Polic,, 36(3), 1029-1043.
Wirl. F., & Kujundzic, A. (2004). The Impact of OPEC Conference Outcomes on World Oil Prices 1984-2001, The Energy Journal, 25(1), 45-62.
World Bank Data (2001-2017), various issues.