Search published articles
Showing 3 results for Consumer Rights
Abbas Ghasemi Hamed, Pari Khaledi,
Volume 12, Issue 2 (7-2012)
Abstract
The harms and damages caused by consumption of damaged or dangerous goods is an undeniable fact and in some cases can be an extremely bitter and sad event. In order to support consumers in such a situation, the creation and use of preventive laws and regulations is the first step towards introducing damages. Passing legislation to compensate for damages incurred by consumers is the next step. Recognizing the responsibility of the sellers of damaged or dangerous goods has a particular importance for the compensation of harms to the consumer of this kind of product. In the area of responsibility of sellers of damaged or dangerous goods and compensation for the consumers of these goods, in addition to the general regulations and special laws protecting consumer rights, we can also use laws and regulations that have not necessarily been adopted with the rights of consumers specifically in mind. The laws and regulations relating to rules preventing harm to the consumers of damaged or dangerous goods have previously been considered by the authors in another article . In the present article one section of the laws and regulations that contain rules relating to compensation is considered. A methodology based on library research along with a descriptive and analytical approach has also been used in this paper.
Volume 20, Issue 137 (7-2023)
Abstract
Accurate food labelling is of utmost importance for fair trade and empowering consumers to make knowledgeable choices. Quantitative assessment of the meats is one of the most important factors in authentication of this meat product. Therefore, the purpose of this research was the efficiency of the stereological method for detection of the percentage of meat used in raw (Hamburger) and heat-treated (Sausage) meat products. In this study, three samples of beef burger (containing 30, 60 and 90 % meat) and sausage (containing 40, 60 and 90 % meat) were prepared. Each sample was flattened, and then fractionator sampling using a perforated plate as a cutting guide was used for getting systematic uniform random blocks. Totally, 12 blocks were taken from each sample. Each block was fixed in 10 % neutral formalin and embedded in paraffin. The obtained samples, after preparation of tissue sections and staining using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), were studied by a light microscope. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA statistical method and t-test was used to compare significance difference between groups. Stereological analysis showed that the estimated meat percentages in beef burger in different percentages (30, 60 and 90%) did not have a significant difference with the real percentages of meat. In the case of sausage, there was significant difference between the estimated meat percentages and the real percentages of meat in different samples of sausage. Stereology method can be a suitable complementary method to detect the amount of meat used in raw meat products.
Volume 22, Issue 1 (5-2018)
Abstract
Comparative advertising is one of the current methods of advertising goods and services. This method has been established Based on comparing products and services in the essential characteristics such as quality, raw materials, the effectiveness of the product or external elements such as price and warranty period. Comparison can be either explicit by mentioning the name and trademark of a competitor or it can only imply the comparison with other trademark. Different approaches have been adopted in different legal systems in relation to this phenomenon because on the one hand, comparative advertising can be effective in informing consumers and protecting their rights, and on the other hand it may overshadow the rights of other competitors. At first it was the French lawyers and their jurisprudence, that according to the general rules of civil liability and prohibition of misleading advertising Law, consider the comparative advertising as an example of unfair competition and so it was prohibited and punishable. However, eventually french Laws have been reformed and the this kind of advertising – by adapting some legal requirements- became legitimate. in European ::union:: comparative advertising had a similar story and after the ban, eventually with the guidelines issued by the European authorities, in compliance with the limits and conditions set forth in the guidelines, was legitimate. In Iranian Law and Islamic jurisprudence, there is no specific rules on this matter, but according to the general rules of Islamic jurisprudence, comparative advertising can be accepted as a legitimate method of conduct.
